NCOIL Staff Participated in “No-Shave November” for Fourth Consecutive Year

For Immediate Release
December 3, 2019
Contact: Paul Penna
(732)201-4133

NCOIL STAFF PARTICIPATED IN “NO-SHAVE NOVEMBER” FOR FOURTH CONSECUTIVE YEAR
Effort Raised Funds & Awareness for Cancer Research

Manasquan, NJ – NCOIL CEO Commissioner Tom Considine, General Counsel Will Melofchik, and Executive Director Paul Penna participated in “NoShave November” for the fourth consecutive year.

“For the past four years the NCOIL staff participated in No-Shave November and it has proven to be an itchy and somewhat unkempt
success. As some of you know, I am a cancer survivor and sadly lost my mom to this disease. The fight against cancer has always been personally important, now more than ever” said Considine.

No-Shave November’s mission is to raise funds for cancer research and treatment, and to educate the population about preventive measures. Starting with the surviving children of one father who died of cancer in November 2007, the movement has since spread around the globe. Participants put down their razors for 30 days each year to join the fight against cancer. This year, NCOIL Support Services made contributions to the Melanoma Research Foundation (MRF) and the Prostate Cancer Foundation (PCF).

The MRF is the leading melanoma community to transform melanoma from one of the deadliest cancers to one of the most treatable. Melanoma diagnoses are increasing at epidemic rates, claiming more 7,000 American lives every year. It is the deadliest form of skin cancer. However, nine out of ten cases are considered to be preventable. The MCF’s mission is to eradicate melanoma by accelerating medical research while educating to and advocating for the melanoma community.

The PCF funds the world’s most promising research to improve the prevention, detection, and treatment of prostate cancer and ultimately save patients’ lives. Right now, one man dies every 17 minutes from prostate cancer in the United States. PCF’s goal is to end all deaths from prostate cancer by raising awareness and funding urgent cutting-edge research.

“No-Shave November raises money for a great cause,” said NSS Executive Director Paul Penna. “It’s a fun way to grow awareness by embracing our hair, which many cancer patients lose. The cause is worth getting a little scruffy.”

NCOIL General Counsel, Will Melofchik, said, “This is my fourth year supporting this important cause, and it’s always great to be a part of this collective effort to help find a cure. All of us are affected one way or another. I will gladly bring attention to my beard if it means bringing attention to this disease.”

The No-Shave November campaign has successfully raised over millions to combat this disease. Every dollar raised brings us one step closer in our efforts to fund cancer research and education, help prevent the disease, and aid those fighting the battle. Each whisker grown allows us to embrace our hair, which many cancer patients lose during treatment.

More information on No-Shave November can be found at:
https://no-shave.org/

More information on the Melanoma Research Foundation can be found here:

Home

More information on the Prostate Cancer Foundation can be found here:

Homepage

– 30 –

NCOIL is a national legislative organization with the nation’s 50 states as members, represented principally by legislators serving on their states’ insurance and financial institutions committees. NCOIL writes Model Laws in insurance and financial services, works to preserve the State jurisdiction over insurance as established by the McCarran-Ferguson Act seventy four years ago, and to serve as an educational forum for public policymakers and interested parties. Founded in 1969, NCOIL works to assert the prerogative of legislators in making State policy when it comes to insurance and educate State legislators on current and longstanding insurance issues.

NCOIL Applauds Bipartisan House Vote for TRIA Extension

 

For Immediate Release
November 4, 2019
Contact: Paul Penna
(732)201-4133

NCOIL APPLAUDS BIPARTISAN HOUSE VOTE FOR TRIA EXTENSION
Urges Swift Passage in House and Senate

Manasquan, NJ – Members of the House Financial Services Committee voted Thursday, October 31st, to pass H.R. 4634, the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2019, as amended. If passed, the bill would prevent the expiration next year of the federal government’s
terrorism insurance backstop program.

LA Senator Dan “Blade” Morrish, NCOIL President, said “Since established subsequent to the 9/11 terrorist attacks, TRIA has provided the nation with economic stability and protection in the event of a future terrorist attack. NCOIL supports Congress in taking a positive step toward ensuring TRIA is reauthorized well ahead of its deadline. We urge the House and Senate to move swiftly and pass this bill on to the President’s desk as soon as possible.”

The amended bill, introduced by House Financial Services Committee Chairwoman Maxine Waters, would also require a report of the U.S. Government Accountability Office on cyber terrorism risks. This proposal set out a recommendation on how Congress could amend the act to account for adequate coverage for an act of cyber terrorism.

“Unfortunately, the United States continues to be at stake of future international and domestic threats and may always be. TRIA is critical to American businesses and consumers, providing vital economic protection both before and after an attack, while leaving the business of providing the underlying coverage in the hands of the states,” stated NCOIL CEO, Commissioner Tom Considine. “This bill for a long-term reauthorization of TRIA, along with the appropriate amendments made, would give the nation the financial security and assurances needed to meet the next generation of dangers to our country,” he concluded.

The federal terrorism insurance backstop program, the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002, is set to expire at the end of 2020. The amended bill shortens the extension to seven years from the original bill’s 10 years. NCOIL supports this bi-partisan bill for a long-term reauthorization of TRIA.

Full information and updates on H.R. 4634 can be viewed here:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4634

– 30 –

NCOIL is a national legislative organization with the nation’s 50 states as members, represented principally by legislators serving on their states’ insurance and financial institutions committees. NCOIL writes Model Laws in insurance and financial services, works to preserve the State jurisdiction over insurance as established by the McCarran-Ferguson Act seventy four years ago, and to serve as an educational forum for public policymakers and interested parties. Founded in 1969, NCOIL works to assert the prerogative of legislators in making State policy when it comes to insurance and educate State legislators on current and longstanding insurance issues.

NCOIL Urges Support for Bill Reauthorizing TRIA Until 2030

 

For Immediate Release
October 22, 2019
Contact: Paul Penna
(732) 201-4133

NCOIL URGES SUPPORT FOR BILL REAUTHORIZING TRIA UNTIL 2030
Congressional Action Taken on Federal Backstop Program for Insurance Against Terrorism

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Manasquan, NJ – House Financial Services Committee Chairwoman Maxine Waters introduced H.R. 4634, the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2019 (TRIPRA) on October 11th. NCOIL supports this bi-partisan bill for a long-term reauthorization of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 (TRIA) for ten more years, from December 31, 2020 to December 31, 2030.

Congress reauthorized and modified TRIA in 2005, 2007, and 2015 through TRIPRA. Signed by President George W. Bush in 2002, TRIA created a temporary federal program that provides for a transparent system of shared public and private compensation for certain insured losses resulting from a certified act of terrorism. Its enaction permitted private markets to stabilize, resume pricing, and build capacity after the events of September 11, 2001. The Secretary of the Treasury administers the program with the assistance of the Federal Insurance Office.

Just last month, a bi-partisan group of NCOIL legislators met with members of Congress in Washington to discuss the importance of terrorism risk insurance and ensuring that TRIA is reauthorized in a timely manner. Congress must take action to extend the protection offered by TRIA well in advance of the December 31, 2020 deadline in order to avoid adverse economic consequences. On September 17th, NCOIL Officers adopted a Resolution in Support of the Reauthorization of TRIA.

“TRIA is critical to the nation’s economic security. Without this backstop, the space in which a viable private market for terrorism insurance has grown would be threatened,” said LA Sen. Dan “Blade” Morrish, NCOIL President. “NCOIL supports the enactment of a long-term extension of TRIA because it has provided this country with important protection for economic continuity and recovery in the event of a future terrorist attack.”

NCOIL is a long-time supporter of TRIA, as the United States continues to be engaged in an ongoing war against international terrorists and the threats of future attacks inside the country remains high. Without adequate coverage, a limited availability of insurance against terrorism  would have a severe adverse effect on our country’s economy. Financiers would be reluctant to lend, businesses would be reluctant to invest, and consumers would be unable to afford terrorism risk insurance.

Commissioner Tom Considine, NCOIL CEO, said “American businesses must be provided with the essential coverage to successfully operate in today’s uncertain global environment. Failure by Congress to extend TRIA would likely result in the inability of insurers to offer coverage for future catastrophes resulting from terrorism, making terrorism risk insurance unavailable and unaffordable. NCOIL applauds Chairwoman Waters for introducing this bill as well as the 27 bipartisan cosponsors who signed on to ensure a sustained and stable terrorism risk insurance marketplace.”

H.R. 4634 was referred to the House Committee on Financial Services on October 11th. Chairwoman Waters announced her plan for long-term, bipartisan TRIA Reauthorization on October 16th at a press conference.

Two subcommittees of the House Financial Services Committee held a joint hearing on October 16th, at which NCOIL submitted the following Statement for the Record:

NCOIL Statement for the Record U.S. House Financial Services Committee Subcommittee on Housing, Community Development, and Insurance and Subcommittee on National Security, International Development, and Monetary Policy Hearing on “Protecting America: The Reauthorization of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program” – October 16, 2019: https://ncoil.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/TRIA-statement-10-14-19.pdf

NCOIL Resolution in Support of the Reauthorization of TRIA: Adopted Sep. 17, 2019https://ncoil.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/NCOIL-TRIA-DC-Resolution.pdf

Congresswoman Waters’ opening remarks from press conference discussing TRIA Reauthorization can be viewed here:
https://financialservices.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=404526

Full information about H.R. 4634 can be viewed here:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4634?s=1&r=53

– 30 –

NCOIL is a national legislative organization with the nation’s 50 states as members, represented principally by legislators serving on their states’ insurance and financial institutions committees. NCOIL writes Model Laws in insurance and financial services, works to preserve the State jurisdiction over insurance as established by the McCarran-Ferguson Act seventy four years ago, and to serve as an educational forum for public policymakers and interested parties. Founded in 1969, NCOIL works to assert the prerogative of legislators in making State policy when it comes to insurance and educate State legislators on current and longstanding insurance issues.

NCOIL Workers’ Compensation Insurance Committee has Interim Committee Conference Call

For Immediate Release
October 15, 2019
Contact: Paul Penna
(732) 201-4133

NCOIL WORKERS’ COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMMITTEE HAS INTERIM COMMITTEE CONFERENCE CALL
Committee Discusses Latest Version of the NCOIL Model Workers’ Compensation Drug Formulary Act

Manasquan, NJ – Nevada Assemblywoman Maggie Carlton, Chair of the NCOIL Workers’ Compensation Insurance Committee hosted an interim conference call meeting of the NCOIL Workers’ Compensation Insurance Committee on Thursday, October 10th.

The purpose of the interim meeting was for the Committee to discuss and consider the latest version of the NCOIL Model Workers’ Compensation Drug Formulary Act, sponsored by Indiana Representative Matt Lehman, NCOIL Vice President.

“I sponsored this legislation in Indiana and believe it is needed as a national model” said IN Representative Matt Lehman, NCOIL Vice-President. “We have made changes to alleviate concerns among interested parties and believe it is now in a form for legislators around the country to submit for pre-introduction for the 2020 session, of course subject to adoption at the Annual Meeting in December.”

The discussion draft can be viewed here – https://ncoil.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/WorkComp-formualry-model-2-2-10-8-19-1.pdf and comment letters have been posted under the Workers’ Compensation Insurance Committee here – https://ncoil.org/committee-workingdrafts/.

“This is yet another example that NCOIL continues to find sensible solutions to public policy questions in a timely manner” said Commissioner Tom Considine, NCOIL CEO. “There has been significant discussion on this issue for close to a year now and it appears that consensus among our members is at hand.”

-30-

NCOIL is a national legislative organization with the nation’s 50 states as members, represented principally by legislators serving on their states’ insurance and financial institutions committees. NCOIL writes Model Laws in insurance and financial services, works to preserve the State jurisdiction over insurance as established by the McCarran-Ferguson Act seventy four years ago, and to serve as an educational forum for public policymakers and interested parties. Founded in 1969, NCOIL works to assert the prerogative of legislators in making State policy when it comes to insurance and educate State legislators on current and longstanding insurance issues.

NCOIL Applauds House Passage of SAFE Banking Act of 2019, Urges Swift Senate Passage

For Immediate Release
September 30, 2019
Contact: Paul Penna
(732) 201-4133

NCOIL APPLAUDS HOUSE PASSAGE OF SAFE BANKING ACT OF 2019, URGES SWIFT SENATE PASSAGE

Provides Certainty for Banking and Insurance Market and Preserves State-Based System of Insurance Regulation

Manasquan, NJ – NCOIL CEO Commissioner Tom Considine applauds the House passage of H.R. 1595, the Secure and Fair Enforcement (SAFE) Banking Act of 2019. The bill now heads to the Senate for consideration.

The SAFE Banking Act establishes a “safe harbor” to credit unions and other depository institutions providing payment services to an individual or business engaged in cannabis-related commerce operating under the color of state law. The bill applied only to banks until recently. The addition of key provisions from the Clarifying Law Around Insurance Marijuana (CLAIM) Act prevents federal criminal prosecution of and civil liability for agents, brokers, and insurers, and their officers, directors, and employees engaging in the business of insurance in states that have legalized cannabis in some form.

“NCOIL supports the SAFE Banking Act and will continue to support legislation that preserves the proven state-based system of insurance regulation. This legislation is a comprehensive solution to provide certainty for the banking and insurance market while also preserving the states’ traditional role in regulating the business of insurance. We at NCOIL urge the Senate to pass this legislation,” said NCOIL President Sen. Dan “Blade” Morrish, LA.

During the fourth annual DC Educational Fly-in, one week prior to the House passage of H.R.1595, NCOIL legislators participated in over 60 meetings with Members of Congress and their staff. One of the key topics discussed was the CLAIM Act, H.R. 4074/S.2201. NCOIL does not take a position regarding the legalization of medicinal and/or recreational marijuana. Rather, NCOIL notes this legislation simply protects insurers that are engaging in the business of insurance with cannabis-related businesses operating under color of state law.

“NCOIL believes that without this bipartisan legislation, insurers will understandably continue to be hesitant to insure businesses operating in the lawful cannabis sector because of the differences of the legal treatment of cannabis and cannabis products under federal and state law,” stated NCOIL CEO Tom Considine. “It is important to ensure these businesses can fully operate just as any other legal business would. Confirming that the insurance industry is not caught between conflicting obligations under federal and state law when serving consumers would essentially provide these small businesses with more insurance options,” concluded Considine.

Full information about H.R. 1595 can be viewed here:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/1595/text

-30-

NCOIL is a legislative organization comprised principally of legislators serving on state insurance and financial institutions committees around the nation. NCOIL writes Model Laws in insurance and financial services, works to both preserve the state jurisdiction over insurance as established by the McCarranFerguson Act seventy years ago and to serve as an educational forum for public policy makers and interested parties. Founded in 1969, NCOIL works to assert the prerogative of legislators in making state policy when it comes to insurance and educate state legislators on current and perennial insurance issues

NCOIL Concludes Fourth Annual DC Fly-in to Educate Members of Congress About the Importance of State-Based Insurance Regulation

For Immediate Release
September 24, 2019
Contact: Paul Penna
(732) 201-4133

NCOIL CONCLUDES FOURTH ANNUAL DC FLY-IN TO EDUCATE MEMBERS OF CONGRESS ABOUT THE IMPORTANCE OF STATE-BASED INSURANCE REGULATION

National cross section of State Legislators Met with More Than 60 Senators, Representatives, Committee Staff and Member Staff to Further Education Process

Manasquan, NJ: – On September 18th, a bi-partisan group of NCOIL legislators from State Senates and State Houses of Representatives around the country met in Washington DC to educate Members of Congress and their staffs about the vital importance of state-based regulation of insurance and its success for more than 70 years.

Participating legislators including LA Senator Dan “Blade” Morrish, NCOIL President; IN Rep. Matt Lehman, NCOIL Vice President; AR Senator Jason Rapert, NCOIL Immediate Past President; KY Rep. Joe Fischer, Chair of the NCOIL Life Insurance & Financial Planning Committee; KY Rep. Bart Rowland, Vice Chair of the NCOIL Financial Services & Multi-Lines Committee; LA Rep. Edmond Jordan, Chair of the NCOIL Property & Casualty Insurance Committee; NC Sen. Vickie Sawyer, Chair of the NCOIL Special Committee on Natural Disaster Recovery; and TX Rep. Tom Oliverson, Vice Chair of the NCOIL Health Insurance and Long Term Care Committee. They, together with NCOIL CEO Commissioner Tom Considine and staff, participated in more than 60 meetings with Senators, Congressman, and committee and congressional staff, including significant numbers of both the House Financial Services Committee and Senate Banking Committee, to highlight the need to protect the state-based system of insurance regulation.

Meetings included more than 60 meetings overall and more than two dozen member meetings including Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and senior staff to Rep. Maxine Waters, Chair of the House Financial Service Committee.

“Members of Congress and their staff need to know the importance of state-based regulation of insurance to their states and the country” said LA. Sen. Dan “Blade” Morrish, NCOIL President. “The efforts of NCOIL legislators to educate our federal colleagues and have a continuous dialogue with them on a variety of issues has proven to be useful in advancing shared policy goals.”

Legislators discussed protection of the state based regulation of insurance; reauthorization of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act; the role of the Federal Insurance Office; the need for a long-term reauthorization and modernization of the National Flood Insurance Program; the Clarifying Law Around Insurance Marijuana (CLAIM) Act, which would establish a federal “safe harbor” for insurers engaged in the business of insurance with cannabis-related businesses operating under the color of  state law; and amending the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1975 (ERISA) to add a statutory waiver provision so that the protections set forth in state balance billing laws apply to all health insurance plans – including self insured plans.

NCOIL legislators met with and engaged in dialogue with House Financial Services member Rep Steve Stivers – OH who is the ranking member of the Subcommittee on National Security, International Development, and Monetary Policy. In his previous role as a state legislator, Rep. Stivers was a regular participant at NCOIL meetings.

“During my time in the Ohio State Senate, I worked directly on improving insurance regulations and I was glad to see NCOIL represented in Washington,” said Rep. Stivers (OH). “Their efforts can have a real impact in strengthening the state-based regulation of insurance.”

“For the fourth year in a row, NCOIL has had a successful and beneficial educational fly-in with our federal colleagues. State legislators have worked to affirm the state-based system of insurance that promotes growth and solvency in the market while protecting consumers, and which has worked for nearly three quarters of a century since the passage of McCarran-Ferguson Act” said NCOIL CEO Tom Considine, former NJ Banking and Insurance Commissioner. “This year we had more participating legislators and met with more members of Congress and staff than the previous year and the effort is paying dividends in terms of the recognition of the success of the state-based system from our federal counterparts.

For the three previous years, NCOIL hosted an Education Fly-In where more than a half dozen NCOIL legislators traveled to Washington DC and participated in more than 50 meetings to educate Members of Congress and their staff about the well-established state-based regulation of insurance in the United States. This year represents the highest number of participating legislators and meetings participated.

-30-

NCOIL is a national legislative organization with the nation’s 50 states as members, represented principally by legislators serving on their states’ insurance and financial institutions committees. NCOIL writes Model Laws in insurance and financial services, works to preserve the State jurisdiction over insurance as established by the McCarran-Ferguson Act seventy four years ago, and to serve as an educational forum for public policymakers and interested parties. Founded in 1969, NCOIL works to assert the prerogative of legislators in making State policy when it comes to insurance and educate State legislators on current and longstanding insurance issues

NCOIL Recognizes Natural Disaster Resiliency Week

For Immediate Release
August 29, 2019
Contact: Paul Penna
(732) 201-4133

NCOIL RECOGNIZES NATURAL DISASTER RESILIENCY WEEK

September 1st – 7th Highlights Preparedness Needs

Manasquan, NJ – During the Special Committee on Natural Disaster Recovery earlier this year, Louisiana Senator Dan “Blade” Morrish, NCOIL President, sponsored a resolution declaring September 1st – 7th Natural Disaster Resiliency Week. The motion carried unanimously on a voice vote and was affirmed by the Executive Committee.

“I sponsored this resolution because it is vital that we do everything we can to be prepared for natural disasters” said Morrish. “It is impossible to know when a natural disaster will happen, where it will happen and what the ultimate consequences will be, but a strategy can be in place.”

“This is a fine example of NCOIL providing a value added for the states. NCOIL works diligently to ensure that state legislators have tools to be prepared” said Commissioner Tom Considine, NCOIL CEO. “The Special Committee on Natural Disaster Recovery is discussing best strategies and examining what states have previously done to recover as well as working to develop model legislation aimed at facilitating the growth of the private flood insurance market.

A full copy of the resolution can be viewed here – https://ncoil.org/wpcontent/uploads/2019/03/Resiliency-Resolution-FINAL-1-1.pdf

-30-

NCOIL is a national legislative organization with the nation’s 50 states as members, represented principally by legislators serving on their states’ insurance and financial institutions committees. NCOIL writes Model Laws in insurance and financial services, works to preserve the State jurisdiction over insurance as established by the McCarran-Ferguson Act seventy four years ago, and to serve as an educational forum for public policymakers and interested parties. Founded in 1969, NCOIL works to assert the prerogative of legislators in making State policy when it comes to insurance and educate State legislators on current and longstanding insurance issues.

NCOIL Amends and Re-Adopts Insurance Fraud Model Act

For Immediate Release
July 29, 2019
Contact: Paul Penna
(732) 201-4133

NCOIL AMENDS AND RE-ADOPTS INSURANCE FRAUD MODEL ACT
Modernizes NCOIL Model Law First Adopted in 1995

Manasquan, NJ – The NCOIL Financial Services and Multi-Lines Committee amended and readopted the Insurance Fraud Model Act at the recently concluded 2019 NCOIL Summer Meeting in Newport Beach, CA. The amendments were sponsored by Arkansas Senator Jason Rapert, NCOIL Immediate Past President.

“Insurance Fraud is a serious problem that cheats honest consumers” said Rapert. “As legislators, we need to be vigilant to protect consumers and industry from insurance fraud. There have been tremendous technological changes since this was first adopted in 1995. Updating the NCOIL Insurance Fraud Model Act is a logical way to do that.”

Senator Rapert worked closely with the Coalition Against Insurance Fraud to update and modernize the NCOIL model, which was first adopted in 1995, and readopted periodically.

“The Coalition Against Insurance Fraud values our long-standing partnership with NCOIL and appreciates the work to amend this model” said Matthew Smith, Director of Government Affairs & General Counsel for the Coalition Against Insurance Fraud. “The Coalition worked tirelessly to update this very successful model for this century.”

The model, which has been adopted in whole or part in 28 states is updated to provide increased authority for prosecutors; streamline the proof of intent to defraud and how the intent to defraud is identified; and eliminate multiple-proof requirements in many areas to allow for greater prosecution.

“I sponsored the fraud model in my state in 2012 as chair of the Louisiana Senate Insurance Committee” said Louisiana Senator Dan “Blade” Morrish, NCOIL President. “It has proven to be a useful tool to combat fraud and I look forward to the Louisiana legislature enacting the updates as soon as possible.”

As insurance fraud moves internationally and multi-ring fraud accelerates the model allows for evidence of multi-state operations or fraud committed in another state to be used in the prosecution of insurance fraud in another state. The model also calls for – depending on individual state laws and federal bankruptcy laws – orders of restitution against people who commit fraud to be nondischargeable in bankruptcy so that they cannot escape the restitution order.

“NCOIL has long been a leader in combating fraud” said Commissioner Tom Considine, NCOIL CEO. “There are multiple examples of our collaboration including NCOIL serving on the Coalition’s board, to working to update this model and routinely hearing updates from Coalition members regularly at NCOIL meetings.”

Further, the model allows in civil actions the recovery of attorney’s fees, and on the insurance carrier side, the model allows for the rise of the independent contractor’s outsourcing third party’s that insurance companies are using to both protect those individuals under provisions of the model and if they are the ones committing fraud, the model allows them to be held liable. The model now includes fraud in-the-part vs. fraud in-the-whole meaning that under the prior version of the model the entire claim or act had to be fraudulent before the model applied. Now, if only a portion of the claim or act such as medical billing is fraudulent, the model applies. Also, there have been a lot of changes in the past 20 years with regard to medical services, so now terms such as healing arts and pharmacology are included in the model.

A copy of the model is below.

NATIONAL COUNCIL OF INSURANCE LEGISLATORS (NCOIL)

INSURANCE FRAUD MODEL ACT

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

*Adopted by the NCOIL Executive Committee on July 28, 1995; amended on February 26, 1998; and readopted on November 16, 2001; November 19, 2004; and November 22, 2009. Re-adopted by the Financial Services & Multi-Lines Issues Committee on July 12th, 2019 and by the Executive Committee on July 13th, 2019 with amendments sponsored by Sen. Jason Rapert (AR)

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF ____________

The legislature finds that insurance fraud is pervasive and expensive, costing consumers and the business community of this state millions of dollars each year. Each family incurs in excess of several hundreds of dollars annually in direct and indirect costs attributable to insurance fraud. Insurance fraud takes innocent lives through stated accidents, arsons and unnecessary medical procedures. Insurance fraud increases premiums, leaves consumers with fewer insurance options, and places businesses at risk. Some forms of insurance fraud can also lead to the financial collapse of smaller insurance companies, and negatively impacts all insurers regardless of size. Insurance fraud reduces consumers’ ability to raise their standard of living and decreases the economic vitality of our state.

Therefore, the legislature believes that the state of __________ must aggressively confront the problem of insurance fraud by facilitating the detection, reducing the occurrence through stricter enforcement and deterrence, requiring restitution and increasing the partnership among consumers, the insurance industry and the state in coordinating efforts to combat insurance fraud by enacting the following Act.

Table of Contents

Section 1. Definitions
Section 2. Fraudulent Insurance Act
Section 3. Unlawful Insurance Act
Section 4. Criminal Penalties
Section 5. Restitution
Section 6. Administrative Penalties
Section 7. Civil Remedies
Section 8. Exclusivity of Remedies
Section 9. Cooperation
Section 10. Immunity
Section 11. Regulatory Requirements

Section 1. Definitions

As used in this act, unless the context requires otherwise, the following terms have the meaning ascribed to them in this section.

Actual Malice. “Actual Malice” means knowledge that information is false, or “reckless” disregard of whether it is false.

Conceal. “Conceal” or “Concealment” means to take affirmative action to prevent others from discovering information. Mere inadvertent or unintentional failure to disclose information, by itself, does not constitute concealment. Action by the holder of a legal privilege, or one who has a reasonable belief such a privilege exists, to prevent discovery of privileged information does not constitute concealment.

Insurance Policy. “Insurance Policy” means the written instrument in which are set forth the terms of any certificate of insurance, binder of coverage or contract of insurance (including a certificate, binder or contract issued by a state-assigned risk plan); benefit plan; nonprofit hospital service plan; motor club service plan; or surety bond, cash bond or any other alternative to insurance authorized by this state’s financial responsibility act. Insurance Policy also is any other instruments authorized or regulated by the department of insurance.

Insurance Professional. “Insurance Professional” means sales agents, managing general agents, brokers, producers, adjusters, investigators, examiners, consultants, and third-party administrators. An “Insurance Professional” may be a direct employee, independent contractor or in any other similar status of providing service to the insurance company.

Insurance Transaction. “Insurance Transaction” means a transaction by, between or among: (1) an Insurer or a Person who acts on behalf of an Insurer; and (2) an insured, claimant, applicant for insurance, public adjuster, Insurance Professional, Practitioner, or any Person who acts on behalf of any of the foregoing, for the purpose of obtaining insurance or reinsurance, calculating insurance Premiums, submitting a claim, negotiating or adjusting a claim, or otherwise obtaining insurance, self-insurance, or reinsurance or obtaining the benefits thereof or therefrom.

Insurer. “Insurer” means any Person purporting to engage in the business of insurance or authorized to do business in the state or subject to regulation by the state, who undertakes to indemnify another against loss, damage or liability arising from a contingent or unknown event. “Insurer” includes, but is not limited to, an insurance company; self-insurer; reinsurer; reciprocal exchange; interinsurer; risk retention group; Lloyd’s insurer; fraternal benefit society; surety; medical service, dental, optometric or any other similar
health service plan; and any other legal entity engaged or purportedly engaged in the business of insurance, including any Person or entity which falls within the definition of “Insurer” found within the _______________ Insurance Code §__________.

Pattern or practice. “Pattern or practice” means repeated, routine or generalized in nature, and not merely isolated or sporadic. Evidence of pattern or practice may include acts in this state or any other jurisdiction.

Person. “Person” means a natural person, company, corporation, unincorporated association, partnership, limited liability company, limited liability partnership, professional corporation, agency of government or any other entity.

Practitioner. “Practitioner” means a licensee of this state authorized to practice medicine, osteopathy, surgery, psychology, chiropractic, pharmacology, or other healing or treatment professions or arts as may be authorized or licensed by this state or the licensed practitioner of any non-medical treatment rendered in accordance with any other recognized method of healing; any other licensee of the state or Person required to be licensed in the state whose services are compensated either in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, by insurance proceeds, including but not limited to automotive repair shops, building contractors and insurance adjusters, or a licensee similarly licensed in other states or nations.

Premium. “Premium” means consideration paid or payable for coverage, or benefits, under an Insurance Policy. “Premium” includes any payments, whether due within the Insurance Policy term or otherwise, and deductible payments whether advanced by the Insurer or Insurance Professional and subject to reimbursement by the insured or otherwise, any self insured retention or payments, whether advanced by the Insurer or Insurance Professional and subject to reimbursement by the insured or otherwise, and any collateral or security to be provided to collateralize obligations to pay any of the above.

Premium Finance Company. “Premium Finance Company” means a Person engaged or purporting to engage in the business of advancing money, directly or indirectly, to an Insurer or producer at the request of an insured pursuant to the terms of a premium finance agreement, including but not limited to loan contracts, notes, agreements or obligations, wherein the insured has assigned the unearned Premiums, accrued dividends, or loss payments as security for such advancement in payment of Premiums on
Insurance Policies only, and does not include the financing of insurance Premiums purchased in connection with the financing of goods and services.

Premium Finance Transaction. “Premium Finance Transaction” means a transaction by, between or among an insured, a producer or other party claiming to act on behalf of an insured and/or a third-party Premium Finance Company, for the purposes of purportedly or actually advancing money directly or indirectly to an Insurer or producer at the request of an insured pursuant to the terms of a premium finance agreement, wherein the insured has assigned the unearned Premiums, accrued dividends or loan payments as security for such advancement in payment of Premiums on Insurance Policies only, and does not include the financing of insurance Premiums purchased in connection with the financing of goods and services.

Reckless. “Reckless” means without reasonable belief of the truth, or, for the purposes of Section 3(c), with a high degree of awareness of probable insolvency.

Withhold. “Withhold” means to fail to disclose facts or information which any law, or regulation, (other than this act) requires to be disclosed. Mere failure to disclose information does not constitute “withholding” if the one failing to disclose reasonably believes that there is no duty to disclose.

Section 2. Fraudulent Insurance Act

Any Person who, knowingly and with intent to defraud or for the purpose of falsely depriving another of property or for pecuniary gain, commits, or attempts to commits, participates in or aids, abets, or conspires to commit or solicits another Person to commit, or permits its employees or its agents to commit any of the following acts, has committed a Fraudulent Insurance Act:

(a) Presents, causes to be presented, or prepares with knowledge or belief that it will be presented, by or on behalf of an insured, claimant or applicant to an Insurer, Insurance Professional or Premium Finance Company in connection with an Insurance Transaction or Premium Finance Transaction, any information which contains false representations as to any material fact, or which Withholds or Conceals a material fact concerning any of the following:

(1) The application for, rating of, or renewal of, any Insurance Policy;

(2) Any claim, whether in whole or in part, for payment or benefit pursuant to any Insurance Policy;

(3) Payments made in accordance with the terms of any Insurance Policy;

(4) Any application used in any Premium Finance Transaction;

(b) Presents, causes to be presented, or prepares with knowledge or belief that it will be presented, to or by an Insurer, Insurance Professional or a Premium Finance Company in connection with an Insurance Transaction or Premium Finance Transaction, any information which contains false representations as to any material fact, or which Withholds or Conceals a material fact, concerning any of the following:

(1) Any solicitation for sale of any Insurance Policy or purported Insurance Policy;

(2) An application for certificate of authority;

(3) The financial condition of any Insurer;

(4) The acquisition, formation, merger, affiliation or dissolution of any Insurer;

(c) Solicits or accepts new or renewal insurance risks by or for an insolvent Insurer;

(d) Removes the assets or records of assets, transactions and affairs or such material part thereof, from the home office or other place of business of the Insurer, or from the place of safekeeping of the Insurer, or destroys or withholds the same from the Department of Insurance;

(e) Diverts, misappropriates, converts or embezzles funds of an Insurer, an insured, claimant or applicant for insurance in connection with:

(1) Any Insurance Transaction;

(2) Any claim for payment or benefit pursuant to any Insurance Policy.

(3) The conduct of business activities by an Insurer or Insurance Professional;

(4) The acquisition, formation, merger, affiliation or dissolution of any Insurer.

It shall be unlawful for any Person to commit, or to attempt to commit, or to aid assist, abet or solicit another to commit, or to conspire to commit any Fraudulent Insurance Act.

Section 3. Unlawful Insurance Act

Any Person who commits, or participates in, or aids, abets, or conspires to commit, or solicits another Person to commit, or permits its employees, contractors or its agents to commit any of the following acts with an intent to induce reliance, has committed an Unlawful Insurance Act:

(a) Presents, causes to be presented, or prepares with knowledge or belief that it will be presented, by or on behalf of an insured, claimant or applicant to an Insurer, Insurance Professional or a Premium Finance Company in connection with an Insurance Transaction or Premium Finance Transaction, any information which the Person knows to contain false representations, or representations the falsity of which the Person has Recklessly disregarded, as to any material fact, or which Withholds or Conceals a material fact, concerning any of the following:

(1) Any application for securing, rating of, or renewal of, any Insurance Policy;

(2) Any claim, in whole or in part, for payment or benefit pursuant to any Insurance Policy;

(3) Payments made in accordance with the terms of any Insurance Policy;

(4) Any application for the financing of any insurance Premium;

(b) Presents, causes to be presented, or prepares with knowledge or belief that it will be presented, to or by an Insurer, Insurance Professional or a Premium Finance Company in connection with an Insurance Transaction or Premium Finance Transaction, any information which the Person knows to contain false representations, or representations the falsity of which the Person has Recklessly disregarded, as to any material fact, or which Withholds or Conceals a material fact, concerning any of the following:

(1) Any solicitation for sale of any Insurance Policy or purported Insurance Policy;

(2) Any application for certificate of authority;

(3) The financial condition of any Insurer;

(4) The acquisition, formation, merger, affiliation or dissolution of any Insurer;

(c) Solicits or accepts new or renewal insurance risks by or for an Insurer which the Person knows was insolvent or the insolvency of which the Person Recklessly disregards.

It shall be unlawful for any Person to commit, or to attempt to commit, or to aid assist, abet or solicit another to commit, or to conspire to commit an Unlawful Insurance Act.

Section 4. Criminal Penalties

Any Person who violates Section 2 of this Act is guilty of:

(a) A Class A misdemeanor if the greater of (i) the value of property, services or other benefit he wrongfully obtained, or attempted to obtain, or (ii) the segregate or aggregate economic loss suffered by any Person or Persons as a result of his violation of Section 2, is less than _____;

(b) A Class B misdemeanor if:

(1) the greater of (i) the value of property, services or other benefit he wrongfully
obtained, or attempted to obtain, or (ii) the segregate or aggregate economic loss suffered by any Person or Persons as a result of his violation of Section 2, is _____ or more but less than _____; or

(2) the greater of (i) the value of property, services or other benefit he wrongfully
obtained, or attempted to obtain, or (ii) the segregate or aggregate economic loss suffered by any Person or Persons as a result of his violation of Section 2, is less than _____, and the defendant has been previously convicted of any class or degree of insurance fraud in any jurisdiction;

(c) A Class C misdemeanor if the greater of (i) the value of property, services or other benefit he wrongfully obtained, or attempted to obtain, or (ii) the segregate or aggregate economic loss suffered by any Person or Persons as a result of his violation of Section 2, is _____ or more but less than _____;

(d) A felony in the third degree if:

(1) the greater of (i) the value of property, services or other benefit he wrongfully
obtained, or attempted to obtain, or (ii) the segregate or aggregate economic loss suffered by any Person or Persons as a result of his violation of Section 2, is _____ or more but less than _____; or

(2) the greater of (i) the value of property, services or other benefit he wrongfully
obtained, or attempted to obtain, or (ii) the segregate or aggregate economic loss suffered by any Person or Persons as a result of his violation of Section 2, is less than _____, and the defendant has been previously convicted two or more times of any class or degree of insurance fraud in any jurisdiction;

(e) A felony in the second degree if the greater of (i) the value of property, services or other benefit he wrongfully obtained, or attempted to obtain, or (ii) the segregate or aggregate economic loss suffered by any Person or Persons as a result of his violation of Section 2, is _____ or more but less than _____

(f) A felony in the first degree if:

(1) the greater of (i) the value of property, services or other benefit he wrongfully
obtained, or attempted to obtain, or (ii) the segregate or aggregate economic loss suffered by any Person or Persons as a result of his violation of Section 2, is _____ or more but less than _____; or

(2) the greater of (i) the value of property, services or other benefit he wrongfully
obtained, or attempted to obtain, or (ii) the segregate or aggregate economic loss suffered by any Person or Persons as a result of his violation of Section 2, is less than _____ and the defendant has been previously convicted two or more times of any degree of felony insurance fraud in any jurisdiction; or

(3) the greater of (i) the value of property, services or other benefit he wrongfully
obtained, or attempted to obtain, or (ii) the segregate or aggregate economic loss suffered by any Person or Persons as a result of his violation of Section 2, is less than _____ and his violation of Section 2 of this Act placed any Person at risk of, or caused, death or serious bodily injury.
Drafting Note: It is the intent of the coalition that the criminal penalties for fraudulent insurance acts should track the existing criminal penalties for similar crimes or fraudulent acts.

Section 5. Restitution

Any person convicted of a violation of Section 2 of this Act shall be ordered to make monetary restitution for any financial loss or damages sustained by any Person as a result of any violation. Financial loss or damage shall include, but is not necessarily limited to, loss of earnings, out-of-pocket and other expenses, paid deductible amounts under an Insurance Policy, Insurer claim payments, all costs reasonably attributable to investigations, legal actions, and recovery efforts, including reasonable attorneys fees, by owners, Insurers, Insurance Professionals, law enforcement and other public authorities, and all costs of prosecution.

When restitution is ordered, the court shall determine its extent and methods. Restitution may be imposed in addition to a fine and, if ordered, any other penalty, but not in lieu thereof. The court shall determine whether restitution, if ordered, shall be paid in a single payment or installments and shall fix a period of time, not in excess of _______, within which payment of restitution is to be made in full.

To the extent permissible, it is the intention such Restitution shall not be dischargeable in any bankruptcy or similar proceeding.

Section 6. Administrative Penalties

(a) (1) Any Practitioner determined by the Court to have violated Section 2 shall be
deemed to have committed an act involving moral turpitude that is inimical to the public well being. The court or prosecutor shall notify the appropriate licensing authority in this state of the judgment for appropriate disciplinary action, including revocation of any such professional license(s), and may notify appropriate licensing authorities in any other jurisdictions where the Practitioner is licensed. Any victim may notify the appropriate licensing authorities in this State and any other jurisdiction where the Practitioner is licensed, of the conviction.

(2) Upon notification of a conviction of any crimes enumerated in Section 2 of this Act or a substantially similar crime under the laws of another state or the United States, this State’s appropriate licensing authority shall hold an administrative hearing, or take other appropriate administrative action authorized by state law, to consider the imposition of the administrative sanctions, up to and including license revocation, as provided by law against the Practitioner. Where the Practitioner has been convicted of a felony violation of Section 2 of this Act or a substantially similar crime under the laws of another state or of the United States, this state’s appropriate licensing authority shall hold an administrative hearing, or take other appropriate administrative action authorized by state law, and shall summarily and permanently revoke the license. It is hereby recommended by the legislature that the [highest court in the state, bar association or other disciplinary agency or responsible organization] shall summarily and permanently disbar any attorney found guilty of such felony.

(3) All such referrals to the appropriate licensing or other agencies, and all dispositive actions thereof, shall be a matter of public record.

(b) (1) A Person convicted of a felony involving dishonesty or breach of trust shall not participate in the business of insurance and may not be eligible for any state licensure relative in any capacity to the business of insurance.

(2) A Person in the business of insurance shall not knowingly or intentionally permit a Person convicted of a felony involving dishonesty or breach of trust to participate in the business of insurance.

Section 7. Civil Remedies

(a) Any Person injured in his or her person, business or property by reason of a violation of Section 3 may recover therefor from the Person[s] violating Section 3, in any appropriate court of this state the following:

(1) Return of any profit, benefit, compensation or payment received by the Person
violating Section 3 directly resulting from said violation;

(2) Reasonable attorneys fees, related legal expenses, including internal legal expenses and court costs;

An action maintained under this subparagraph may neither be certified as a class action nor be made part of a class action.

(b) Any Person injured in his or her person, business or property by reason of a violation of Section 2 may recover therefor from the Person[s] violating Section 2, in any appropriate court of this state the following:

(1) Return of any profit, benefit, compensation or payment received by the Person
violating Section 2 directly resulting from said violation;

(2) Reasonable attorneys fees, related legal expenses, including internal legal expenses and court costs;

(3) All other economic damages directly resulting from the violation of Section 2;

(4) Reasonable investigative fees based on a reasonable estimate of the time and expense incurred in the investigation of the violation(s) of Section 2 proved at trial:

(5) A penalty of no less than $_____ and no greater than $_____.

An action maintained under this subparagraph may neither be certified as a class action nor be made part of a class action.

(c) Any Person injured in his or her person, business or property by a Person violating Section 2, upon a showing of clear and convincing evidence that such violation was part of a Pattern or Practice of such violations, shall be entitled to recover threefold the injured Person’s economic damages together with all reasonable attorneys fees and costs. An action for treble damages must be brought within _____ year(s) of such violation. One third of the treble damages awarded shall be payable to the state to be used solely for the purpose of investigation and prosecution of violations of this Act or other fraudulent behavior relating to Insurance Transactions, and/or for public education relating to insurance fraud. An action maintained under this subparagraph may neither be certified as class action nor be made part of a class action, unless the violations of Section 2 giving rise to the action resulted in criminal conviction of the violator[s] under Section 4.

(d) The State Attorney General, District Attorney or other authorized prosecutorial agency shall have authority to maintain Civil proceedings on behalf of the State Insurance Department and any victims of violations of Section 2. In any such action, the court shall proceed as soon as practicable to the hearing and determination thereof. Pending final determination thereof, the court may at any time enter such restraining orders or prohibitions, or take such other actions, including the acceptance of satisfactory performance bonds, as it shall deem proper.

(1) The Courts of the state shall have jurisdiction to prevent and restrain violations of Section 2 of this Chapter by issuing appropriate orders.

(2) In any action commenced under this subparagraph (d), the Court, upon finding that any Person has violated Section 2, shall levy a fine of up to $25,000 for each violation.

Any court in which a prosecution for violation of Section 2 is pending shall have authority to stay or limit proceedings in any civil action regarding the same or related conduct. Any court in which is pending a civil action brought pursuant to subparagraph (d) of this Section 7 may stay or limit proceedings in actions brought pursuant to subparagraphs (a)-(c) regarding the same or related conduct or may transfer such actions or consolidate them before itself or allow the plaintiffs in such actions to participate in the action brought pursuant to subparagraph (d), as it shall prescribe.

Any cause of action under this section for violation of Section 2 or Section 3 must be brought within three (3) years of the commission of the acts constituting such violation, or within three (3) years of the time the plaintiff discovered (or with reasonable diligence could have discovered) such acts, whichever is later.

An insurer shall not pay damages awarded under this Section 7, or provide a defense or money for a defense, on behalf of an insured under a contract of insurance or indemnification. A third party who asserts a claim against an insured shall have no cause of action under this Section against the Insurer of the insured arising out of the Insurer’s processing or settlement of the third party’s claim. An oblige under a surety bond shall not have a cause of action under this section against the surety arising out of the surety’s processing or settlement of the obligee’s claim against the bond.

Any Person injured in his business or property by reason of a violation of Section 2 or Section 3 of this Chapter may recover under only one of the subparagraphs in this Section.

Section 8. Exclusivity of Remedies

The remedies expressly provided in Section 7 shall be the only private remedies for violations of this Act and no additional remedies shall be implied. The remedies available under Section 7 shall not be used in conjunction with or in addition to any other remedies available at law or in equity to duplicate recovery for the same element of economic damage. Further, in any civil action pleading both exemplary damages and the treble damages available in Section 7(c), plaintiff shall elect one or the other remedy, but not both, at the conclusion of the evidentiary phase of the trial.

However, nothing in this Act shall limit or abrogate any right of action which may exist in the absence of this Act, but no action based on such a right shall rely on this Act to establish a standard of conduct or for any other purpose.

Section 9. Cooperation

(a) Any Insurer or Insurance Professional that has reasonable belief that an act violating Sections 2 or 3 will be, is being, or has been committed shall furnish and disclose upon request any information in its possession concerning such act to the appropriate law enforcement official or authority, insurance department, state division of insurance fraud, or state or federal regulatory or licensing authority, subject to any legal privilege protecting such information.

(b) Any Person that has a reasonable belief that an act violating Sections 2 or 3 will be, is being, or has been committed, may furnish and disclose any information in its possession concerning such act to representative of an Insurer that requests the information for the purpose of detecting, investigating, prosecuting or preventing insurance fraud subject to any legal privilege protecting such information.

(c) When any law enforcement official, authority, state or federal regulatory or licensing authority requests information related to an investigation or prosecution of allegations of potential insurance fraud, an Insurer or Insurance Professional shall take all reasonable actions to provide any such information in its possession, subject to any legal privilege protecting such information.

(d) Any Insurer or Insurance Professional failing or refusing to cooperate with a request for information from an appropriate local, state or federal governmental authority may, subject to the court’s discretion, forfeit any eligibility for restitution from any proceeds resulting from such governmental investigation and prosecution.

Section 10. Immunity

(a) In the absence of Actual Malice, no Person shall be subject to civil liability and no civil cause of action shall arise for any of the following:

(1) The disclosure of information related to Persons or conduct suspected of violating Sections 2 or 3 of this Act to federal, state or local agencies, officials, their agents, employees and/or designees.

(2) The receipt or possession of information related to Persons or conduct suspected of violating Sections 2 or 3 of this Act when the information was received pursuant to and for the purpose of complying with the provisions of this Act.

(3) The disclosure of information to any organization, whether governmental or private, established to detect and prevent fraudulent insurance acts, their agents, employees or designees; and/or a recognized comprehensive database system approved by the Insurance Department.

(4) The receipt or possession of information received from any organization established to detect and prevent fraudulent insurance acts, their agents, employees or designees; and/or a recognized comprehensive database system approved by the Insurance Department.

(b) The immunity granted in subsection (a) shall also apply to employees, contractors and agents of Insurers or insurance licensees whose responsibilities include the investigation and/or disposition of claims involving suspected violations of Sections 2 or 3 of this Act when sharing information on such acts or persons suspected of engaging in such acts with other entities or organizations employees of the same or other Insurers or insurance licensees, or other appropriate individuals or organizations, whose responsibilities include the investigation and/or disposition of claims involving suspected violations of Sections 2 or 3 of this Act.

(c) State agencies and their employees and/or designees shall not be subject to civil liability for disclosing information identified in subsection (b). No civil cause of action shall arise against any of them by virtue of the publication of a report or bulletin related to the official activities of the State agency.

(d) Any Person against whom any civil action is brought who is found to be immune from liability under this section shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorney’s fees and costs from the party who brought the action.

(e) Nothing in this is intended to abrogate or modify a common law or statutory immunity heretofore enjoyed by any Person.

Section 11. Regulatory Requirements

(a) Anti-Fraud Plans – Within six months of the effective date of this legislation, every Insurer with total annual direct written premiums in excess of five-hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) shall prepare, implement, maintain and submit to the department of insurance an insurance anti-fraud plan.

Each Insurer’s anti-fraud plan shall outline specific procedures, appropriate to the type of insurance the Insurer writes in this state, to:

(1) prevent, detect and investigate all forms of insurance fraud for which the carrier is authorized to issue policies or bonds, including fraud involving the Insurer’s employees or agents; fraud resulting from misrepresentations in the application, renewal or rating of insurance policies; claims fraud; and security of the Insurer’s data processing systems.

(2) educate appropriate employees on fraud detection and the Insurer’s anti-fraud plan.

(3) inform policyholders about insurance fraud and how to protect against and prevent fraud.

(4) provide for the hiring of or contracting for fraud investigators.

(4) report insurance fraud to appropriate law enforcement and regulatory authorities in the investigation and prosecution of insurance fraud.

(6) pursue restitution for financial loss caused by insurance fraud, where appropriate.

(7) designate the person responsible for oversight and implementation of the insurer’s anti-fraud plan, and provide full contact information.

The Commissioner may review, and in their discretion accept or reject, each Insurer’s anti-fraud plan to determine if it complies with the requirements of this subparagraph.

It shall be the responsibility of the Commissioner to assure Insurer compliance with anti-fraud plans submitted to the Commissioner. The Commissioner may require reasonable modification of the Insurer’s anti-fraud plan, or may require other reasonable remedial action if the review or examination reveals substantial non-compliance with the terms of the Insurer’s own anti-fraud plan.

The Commissioner may require each Insurer to file a summary of the Insurer’s anti-fraud activities and results. The anti-fraud plans and the summary of the Insurer’s anti-fraud activities and results are not public records and are exempt from any privacy or public records act, and shall be proprietary and not subject to public examination, and shall not be discoverable or admissible in any civil action, whether arising under this Act or any other proceeding involving civil litigation.

This section confers no private rights of action.

(b) Fraud Warnings

(1) (A) No later than six months after the effective date of this Act, all applications for insurance, and all claim forms regardless of the form of transmission provided and required by an Insurer or required by law as a condition of payment of a claim, shall contain a statement, permanently affixed to the application or claim form, that clearly states in substance the following:

“It is a crime to knowingly provide false, incomplete or misleading information to an insurance company for the purpose of defrauding the company. Penalties include imprisonment, fines and denial of insurance benefits.”

(B) The lack of a statement required in this subparagraph does not constitute a defense in any criminal prosecution under Section 2 nor in any civil action under Sections 2 or 3.

(2) The warning required by this subsection shall not be required on forms relating to reinsurance.

(c) Enforcement – Notwithstanding any other provision of the Insurance Code, the following are the exclusive monetary penalties for violation of this Section. Insurers that fail to prepare, implement, maintain and submit to the department of insurance an insurance anti-fraud plan are subject to a penalty of $500 per day, not to exceed $25,000 together with license suspension or revocation.

Proposed by the Coalition Against Insurance Fraud, 1012 14th Street NW, Suite 200, Washington, D.C. 20005, 202-393-7330. The Coalition is an independent, nonprofit organization of consumers, government agencies and insurers dedicated to combating all forms of insurance fraud through public information and advocacy.

© National Council of Insurance Legislators (NCOIL)

-30-

NCOIL is a national legislative organization with the nation’s 50 states as members, represented principally by legislators serving on their states’ insurance and financial institutions committees. NCOIL writes Model Laws in insurance and financial services, works to preserve the State jurisdiction over insurance as established by the McCarran-Ferguson Act seventy four years ago, and to serve as an educational forum for public policymakers and interested parties. Founded in 1969, NCOIL works to assert the prerogative of legislators in making State policy when it comes to insurance and educate State legislators on current and longstanding insurance issues.

NCOIL Adopts Model Act Concerning Interpretation of State Insurance Laws

For Immediate Release
July 25, 2019
Contact: Paul Penna
(732) 201-4133

NCOIL ADOPTS MODEL ACT CONCERNING INTERPRETATION OF STATE INSURANCE LAWS
Concerns American Law Institute’s Restatement of Law, Liability Insurance

Manasquan, NJ – At the recently concluded 2019 NCOIL Summer Meeting in Newport Beach, CA the NCOIL Property & Casualty Insurance Committee adopted a Model Act Concerning Interpretation of State Insurance Laws sponsored by Kentucky Representative Joe Fischer. The measure passed on a voice vote and was affirmed by the NCOIL Executive Committee.

The model is in direct response to the American Law Institute’s (ALI) Restatement of the Law, Liability Insurance which has garnered significant national attention since it began development.

“As legislators, we preciously guard legislative prerogatives” said Rep. Fischer. “I am grateful to the ALI and their scholars for their willingness to engage in a constructive dialogue with NCOIL, and the work that they produce. I sponsored this measure because it is important to make crystal clear how to properly interpret state insurance laws, and to stress that laws are what legislators vote to enact and executives sign. It is not what others interpret or wish it to be.”

“NCOIL has been engaged with the ALI and their scholars at multiple NCOIL meetings” said LA Sen. Dan “Blade” Morrish, NCOIL President. “I want to thank Rep. Fischer for his work on this and echo what Rep. Fischer stated – as an organization, NCOIL will guard legislative prerogatives and ensure our legislative work is protected from academics that interpret the law into something it is not.”

NCOIL began a constructive dialogue with the ALI on this issue in May 2017 and then discussed it at the NCOIL Property & Casualty Insurance Committee at the 2017 NCOIL Summer Meeting. At the subsequent national NCOIL meeting in Phoenix, AZ in November 2017 there was a General Session titled “A Restatement or a NEWstatement – Examining the ALI’s Proposed Restatement of the Law of Liability Insurance.” The topic has been on every national meeting agenda since that first discussion in July 2017 often with ALI representatives participating.

“For more than two years over seven meetings and an additional interim committee telemeeting, during which a Resolution on this issue was adopted, NCOIL has taken every available step to resolve this amicably” said Commissioner Tom Considine, NCOIL CEO. “There was a consistent and constructive dialogue with the ALI during this time period, and we appreciate the changes made from the initial draft. Certain select portions remain more of an ALI wish list than a statement of the majority rule of current law. NCOIL believes it is important for States to clarify when such a document is appropriate as an authority for jurists.”

A full copy of the model is below.

National Council of Insurance Legislators (NCOIL)

Model Act Concerning Interpretation of State Insurance Laws

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

*Sponsored by Rep. Joseph Fischer (KY)
*Adopted by the Property & Casualty Insurance Committee on Friday, July 12th, 2019 and affirmed by the Executive Committee on Saturday, July 13th, 2019

Section 1.          Title

This Act shall be known as the “Model Act Concerning Interpretation of [State] Insurance Laws.”

Section 2.          Interpretation of [State] Insurance Laws

A statement of the law in the American Law Institute’s Restatement of the Law, Liability Insurance does not constitute the law or public policy of this state if the statement of the law is inconsistent or in conflict with:

(1) The Constitution of the United States or of this state;

(2) A statute of this state;

(3) This state’s case law precedent; or

(4) Other common law that may have been adopted by this state.

Section 3.          Effective Date

This Act shall take effect immediately.

-30-

NCOIL is a national legislative organization with the nation’s 50 states as members, represented principally by legislators serving on their states’ insurance and financial institutions committees. NCOIL writes Model Laws in insurance and financial services, works to preserve the State jurisdiction over insurance as established by the McCarran-Ferguson Act seventy-four years ago, and to serve as an educational forum for public policymakers and interested parties. Founded in 1969, NCOIL works to assert the prerogative of legislators in making State policy when it comes to insurance and educate State legislators on current and longstanding insurance issues.

2019 NCOIL Summer Meeting in Newport Beach A Success

For Immediate Release
July 15, 2019
Contact: Paul Penna
(732) 201-4133

2019 NCOIL SUMMER MEETING IN NEWPORT BEACH A SUCCESS
Continued Policy Discussion, Interesting General Sessions and Important Speakers and Presenters

Manasquan, NJ – The National Council of Insurance Legislators (NCOIL) met this past week at the Newport Beach Marriott Hotel and Spa in Newport Beach, CA and hosted a successful Summer Meeting with more than 315 attendees, 57 legislators from 27 states, including 14 first time attendees, 4 Insurance Commissioners (or equivalent), and representatives of 14 state insurance departments. The 7 policy committees all met, as well as the third meeting of the Special Committee on Natural Disaster Recovery.

“I am proud that NCOIL attracted a large number of first-time attendees and legislators from more than two dozen states” said Louisiana Senator Dan “Blade” Morrish, NCOIL President. “NCOIL continues to grow and its’ reputation as a force to protect state based regulation of insurance is enhanced every day.”

Participants at the Welcome Breakfast heard from CA Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara who discussed his first few months in office and the policy challenges California and the nation face with regard to climate change, cannabis policy and how technology is changing the insurance industry.

“As we celebrate NCOIL’s 50th year, I am proud that the upward trend in participation continues to grow” said Commissioner Tom Considine, NCOIL CEO. “Combine that with high level speakers including FIO Director Steven Seitz, Senior Advisor to the Secretary of Health and Human Services Jim Parker and California Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara show that we are making progress and educating legislators, and now staff about insurance public policy trends.”

Steven Seitz, Director of the Federal Insurance Office delivered remarks about the goals of his office and engaged in a question and answer conversation with Commissioner Considine.

There were three interesting and timely general sessions: “Prior Authorization: An Obstacle to Care or a Needed Cost Saver?”; “Driving Rx Drug Costs Down via Biosimilars?”; and a “Discussion on the Evaporating Insurance Market for Contact Sports.”

The Financial Services & Multi-Lines Committee re-adopted the Insurance Fraud Model Act with amendments to strengthen it since it was passed nearly two decades ago. The Joint State-Federal Relations & International Insurance Issues Committee passed a resolution in support of the recently amended NAIC Credit for Reinsurance Models. The Property & Casualty Insurance Committee re-adopted the State Flood Disaster and Mitigation Relief Model Act and adopted a Model Law in Response to the American Law Institute’s (ALI) Restatement of the Law, Liability Insurance.

The Workers’ Compensation Insurance Committee continued discussion of an NCOIL Workers’ Compensation Drug Formulary Model Act; the Special Committee on Natural Disaster Recovery discussed development of a model law relating to the private flood insurance market; the Joint State-Federal Relations and International Insurance Issues Committee continued discussion about the development of an NCOIL Insurance Business Transfer Model Act and amendments to the NCOIL Market Conduct Surveillance Model Law; the Financial Services & Multi-Lines Issues Committee continued discussion on the development of model legislation relating to insurance modernization initiatives including rebate reforms, and an Insurance E-Commerce Model Act; the Health Insurance and Long Term Care Issues Committee continued discussion of a draft Model Law on Drug Pricing Transparency and began discussions regarding the development of possible model legislation concerning short term limited duration insurance and health care sharing ministries.  Discussions of these proposals will continue during interim committee calls and at the 2019 Annual Meeting in Austin, TX.

Jim Parker, Senior Advisor for Health Reform to the Secretary of Health and Human Services delivered a compelling Keynote Luncheon Address.

Two staff training sessions took place at the Summer Meeting in conjunction with the Institutes Griffith Insurance Education Foundation entitled: “Essential Education for Legislative Staff: Exploring Risk Management & Insurance Regulation Fundamentals”.

“Since there is much work that remains, there will likely be multiple committees that have interim committee calls before the Annual Meeting in December.” Considine concluded.

Committee meeting minutes will be posted within the next week at ncoil.org.

The 2019 NCOIL Annual Meeting will take place in Austin, TX from December 10th – 13th. Registration will open in September.

-30-

NCOIL is a national legislative organization with the nation’s 50 states as members, represented principally by legislators serving on their states’ insurance and financial institutions committees. NCOIL writes Model Laws in insurance and financial services, works to preserve the State jurisdiction over insurance as established by the McCarran-Ferguson Act seventy-four years ago, and to serve as an educational forum for public policymakers and interested parties. Founded in 1969, NCOIL works to assert the prerogative of legislators in making State policy when it comes to insurance and educate State legislators on current and longstanding insurance issues.