NCOIL Property & Casualty Insurance Committee Holds Virtual Interim Meeting

 

For Immediate Release
July 28, 2020
Contact: Cara Zimmermann
(732) 201-4133

NCOIL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMMITTEE HOLDS VIRTUAL INTERIM MEETING

Rowland Takes Reigns as New Committee Chair; Introduced Distracted Driving Model Act; Received Update on NAIC Casualty Actuarial & Statistical Task Force; Discussed Five NCOIL Models Up for Re-Adoption

Manasquan, NJ – The National Council of Insurance Legislators (NCOIL) Property & Casualty Insurance Committee (Committee) held an interim conference call meeting on July 24th. The purpose of the interim meeting was to discuss the first draft of the NCOIL Distracted Driving Model Act, and to provide an update on the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) Casualty Actuarial and Statistical (C) Task Force’s (CASTF) Regulatory Review of Predictive Models White Paper.

NCOIL President Matt Lehman (Rep. IN) appointed Kentucky Representative Bart Rowland as Chair of the Committee. The prior Chair, Georgia Representative Richard Smith was recently named Chair of the Georgia House Rules Committee, a position that comes with enormous responsibility and time demands. In stepping down as Chair of the NCOIL P&C Committee, Rep. Smith did not want the Committee to be held back at all due to his schedule.

NCOIL President Lehman, said, “Richard Smith is a great man and has been a longtime supporter and active member of NCOIL. Richard will continue to stay involved with NCOIL and in fact participated in this meeting. When Richard notified us of his decision, we reflected on an immediate succession plan and Bart Rowland is the person that sprung to mind. Bart has been an NCOIL leader for years and is universally respected in the organization. He has my full confidence and support.”

“Rep. Smith has been a wonderful leader of the P&C Committee in past years to present and while we are sad that he will not be as involved with us this year, we wish him all the best on his new assignment as Chair of the GA House Rules Committee. We are very pleased that Rep. Rowland is up for the task and we feel that he is exactly the type of leader NCOIL needs to take over this position,” stated NCOIL CEO, Commissioner Tom Considine. “Bart has been a ‘go to’ leader here at NCOIL for as long as I’ve been here,” Considine concluded.

The Committee received an update on the work of the NAIC’s Casualty Actuarial and Statistical (C) Task Force’s (CASTF). Specifically, CASTF’s work in developing a Regulatory Review of Predictive Models White Paper. This was a follow-up from the interim meeting of the NCOIL Executive Committee on July 1st during which the Committee adopted a Resolution, sponsored by California Assemblyman Ken Cooley, NCOIL Vice President, “Urging the NAIC To Refrain from Intruding on the Constitutional Role of State Legislators” in response to the work of CASTF. However, while the Committee did adopt the Resolution, it was agreed upon that the Resolution would be held pending further discussion with the NAIC in the hope that the work of the CASTF might be altered.

Considine provided a briefing during this meeting that there have been officer level discussions on the issue, but more need to occur.

The Committee also introduced and discussed the first draft of an NCOIL Distracted Driving Model Act, sponsored by Ohio Senator Bob Hackett and Asm. Cooley. Additionally, Cathy Chase, President of Advocates for Highway & Auto Safety, provided a presentation on the issue.

Asm. Cooley stated, “It is vital that we create this type of legislation for states to use as guidance as they develop legislation beyond the no-texting ban. Developing the appropriate level of penalties is critical. We hope that everyone will get behind this effort in order to improve traffic safety, reduce motor-vehicle related injuries and fatalities, strengthen enforcement, and signal to public and app developers what ‘driver safety’ capabilities their products should have.”

Sen. Hackett said, “I echo Asm. Cooley’s comments. Distracted driving has become a widespread, deadly problem in our country. I think the first draft of the Model is at a great starting point and it is our goal as sponsors to move this forward in a timely manner and continue the drafting discussions until we have it right. The consequences of this Model can actually be life or death. The research shows that the consequence to distracted driving is death more often than not. We have the opportunity to change that outcome as state legislators.”

Additionally, the Committee provided the opportunity for discussion on the five (5) NCOIL Model Laws scheduled for re-adoption at the upcoming NCOIL “Summer” Meeting in September. Those Models are: Post-Assessment Property and Liability Insurance Guaranty Association Model Act (originally adopted November 2007; amended March 2015); Model Act Regarding Medicaid Inception of Insurance Payments (originally adopted November 2014; amended March 2015); Storm Chaser Consumer Protection (adopted July 2005); Model Act Regarding Use of Credit Card Information in Personal Insurance (originally adopted November 2002; re-adopted November 2005; amended 2009; re-adopted November 2015); and Model Act to Regulate Insurance Requirements for Transportation Network Companies and Transportation Network Drivers (adopted July 2015).

Chair Rowland stated, “It is an honor to be appointed by my colleagues to Chair the NCOIL Property & Casualty Insurance Committee. As we all saw from the interim meeting, this Committee has a lot on the agenda for the upcoming ‘Summer’ Meeting and we are just beginning to dive into some of these issues as well as revisiting many important issues. I am humbled that NCOIL is allowing me to step up to this leadership role, and I was pleased with the initial discussions during the interim meeting last week. I urge all parties to keep the conversations going in order to develop high quality public policy for states to consider adopting. That is always the goal of NCOIL public policy.”

There were over 100 participants on the interim virtual meeting which included 17 legislators from 15 states. In addition to the robust dialogue from legislators, NCOIL heard perspectives from a wide array of interested parties including the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies (NAMIC), Uber, the National Conference of Insurance Guaranty Fund (NCIGF), the American Property Casualty Insurance Association (APCIA), the Independent Insurance Agents and Brokers of American (IIABA),

NCOIL notified all meeting attendees during the meeting upon realizing that there was a problem with Zoom access, stating that it had pre-arranged to have a 500-participant capacity and this function was not automatically enabled by Zoom. “That was awful, just awful,” stated Considine. “We’ll refund double anyone’s registration fee who signed up in advance but could not get through.”

Please reach out to Cara Zimmermann [email protected] or Cindy McLavish [email protected] at the NCOIL National Office if you registered for the interim meeting and could not get in through Zoom.

Minutes and the video recording from the meeting will be posted on the NCOIL website in the next week.

All material discussed during the meeting, including the draft of the Distracted Driving Model, can be viewed here: https://ncoil.org/ncoil-property-casualty-insurance-committee-interimconference-call-july-24-2020-100-pm-230-pm-est/

-30-

NCOIL is a national legislative organization with the nation’s 50 states as members, represented principally by legislators serving on their states’ insurance and financial institutions committees. NCOIL writes Model Laws in insurance and financial services, works to preserve the State jurisdiction over insurance as established by the McCarran-Ferguson Act seventy-five years ago, and to serve as an educational forum for public policymakers and interested parties. Founded in 1969, NCOIL works to assert the prerogative of legislators in making State policy when it comes to insurance and educate State legislators on current and longstanding insurance issues.

NCOIL Executive Committee Announces In-Person National Meeting; Takes Other Actions

 

For Immediate Release
July 2, 2020
Contact: Cara Zimmermann
(732) 201-4133

NCOIL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ANNOUNCES IN-PERSON NATIONAL MEETING; TAKES OTHER ACTIONS
Adopted Proposed Articles of Organization and Bylaws Amendments, & Adopted Resolution Urging NAIC to Refrain from Intruding on Constitutional Role of State Legislators

Manasquan, NJ – The National Council of Insurance Legislators (NCOIL) Executive Committee, Chaired by NCOIL President Matt Lehman (Rep. – IN), held an interim conference call meeting on July 1st, announcing it would move forward with its “Summer” National Conference. The event, which had been scheduled for Jersey City, NJ this month, will now be held in Old Town, Alexandria, VA in September.

Additionally, the group passed proposed amendments to the NCOIL Articles of Organization & Bylaws that the NCOIL Bylaws Committee adopted earlier in June. A discussion continued from one held by the NCOIL Property & Casualty Insurance Committee at its most recent meeting this past March in Charlotte, NC regarding the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) Casualty Actuarial and Statistical (C) Task Force’s (CASTF) draft Regulatory Review of Predictive Models White Paper (White Paper). This discussion included the consideration and passage of a Resolution urging the NAIC to refrain from intruding on the Constitutional role of state legislators.

Chair Matt Lehman stated, “We thank all who joined and participated on the call. These interim calls are very important, especially in the circumstances we are in. Since the NCOIL ‘Summer’ Meeting is rescheduled two months later than its usual July meeting, we must be sure to continue having open communication and continuous dialogue between the NCOIL policy committees, consumers, regulators, the insurance industry, and other interested parties in the meantime in order to efficiently address timely issues.”

NCOIL Vice President, CA Asm. Ken Cooley said, “As sponsor of the NCOIL Resolution urging the NAIC to refrain from intruding on the Constitutional role of state legislators, I want to say thank you to my colleagues for engaging in a lively discussion on the issue. The Resolution adopted by the NCOIL Executive Committee is another important action taken by NCOIL to protect and uphold state legislators’ jurisdiction over insurance. We continue to hope we can resolve the disagreement through ongoing dialogue with the NAIC.”

“Regrettably, some have tried to twist this Resolution with contentions that it is suborning indirect racial discrimination. To be clear, the purpose of this Resolution is to maintain the proper constitutional jurisdiction of state legislatures over the significant public policy issues related to insurance. NCOIL stands firmly in its belief that racial discrimination in any and every form is wrong,” concluded NCOIL’s President Lehman.

There were over 70 participants on the interim call which included 26 legislators from 18 states. NCOIL heard from the perspectives of the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies (NAMIC), Center for Economic Justice, former Illinois Director Nat Shapo, and others.

Arizona State Senator David Livingston from LD22, Chair of the NCOIL Articles of Organization & Bylaws Revision Committee said, “We had a very robust discussion on the proposed amendments back in June on the interim call. The amendments better reflect the situation we are in and may potentially face in the future. In the event that NCOIL cannot physically meet, NCOIL needs to be able to carry on. The work we do is too important to come to a halt during these unprecedented times.”

NV Asw. Ellen Spiegel, Vice-Chair of the NCOIL Articles of Organization & Bylaws Revision Committee said, “I want to echo Sen. Livingston’s comments. The amendments to the existing NCOIL model make it stronger and I commend the Executive Committee for adopting these changes.”

NCOIL CEO, Commissioner Tom Considine stated, “This call was a great example of how public policy should be made; legislators hearing from interested parties and sharing views with one another in a spirited, respectful bipartisan public debate. We are really looking forward to seeing all who are able to attend the ‘Summer’ Meeting in September.”

Minutes from the call will be posted on the NCOIL website in the next week.

NCOIL Articles of Organization & Bylaws Amendments can be viewed here.

NCOIL Resolution Urging the NAIC to Refrain from Intruding on the Constitutional Role of State Legislators can be viewed here.

-30-

NCOIL is a national legislative organization with the nation’s 50 states as members, represented principally by legislators serving on their states’ insurance and financial institutions committees. NCOIL writes Model Laws in insurance and financial services, works to preserve the State jurisdiction over insurance as established by the McCarran-Ferguson Act seventy-five years ago, and to serve as an educational forum for public policymakers and interested parties. Founded in 1969, NCOIL works to assert the prerogative of legislators in making State policy when it comes to insurance and educate State legislators on current and longstanding insurance issues.

NCOIL Highlights National Insurance Awareness Day

 

For Immediate Release
June 26, 2020
Contact: Cara Zimmermann
(732) 201-4133

NCOIL HIGHLIGHTS NATIONAL INSURANCE AWARENESS DAY
Urges Businesses and Consumers to Review Insurance Policies

Manasquan, NJ – The National Council of Insurance Legislators (NCOIL) highlights June 28th as National Insurance Awareness Day. This day has been designated to serve as a reminder to business owners to review their insurance policies and ensure they have the coverage they need.

NCOIL President, IN Rep. Matt Lehman stated, “It is extremely important, particularly during these unprecedented times, that people understand their coverage, including a policy’s exclusions. As insurance legislators, many of us who work as insurance professionals outside of the political scene, it is our primary responsibility to work to protect consumers. There is no doubt that 2020 has been a challenging year for businesses across the country. All business owners, particularly small business owners, should make it a point to verify that they have the proper insurance coverage in place.”

NCOIL CEO, Commissioner Tom Considine said, “As with every hurricane season, the need to be prepared is especially important. The vast majority of Americans either do not have flood insurance or are not aware that their policy does not cover flood. In recognition of National Insurance Awareness Day, NCOIL is reminding business owners and consumers to take the time to talk to an insurance agent, review their insurance plans, or get a policy that offers the security needed to recover losses. The value of items can shift over time and situations can change, as we have all experienced in 2020.”

More information on National Insurance Awareness Day can be found here:

National Insurance Awareness Day 2020 – June 28

– 30 –

NCOIL is a national legislative organization with the nation’s 50 states as members, represented principally by legislators serving on their states’ insurance and financial institutions committees. NCOIL writes Model Laws in insurance and financial services, works to preserve the State jurisdiction over insurance as established by the McCarran-Ferguson Act seventy-five years ago, and to serve as an educational forum for public policymakers and interested parties. Founded in 1969, NCOIL works to assert the prerogative of legislators in making State policy when it comes to insurance and educate State legislators on current and longstanding insurance issues

NCOIL Workers’ Compensation Insurance Committee has Interim Conference Call

For Immediate Release
June 4, 2020
Contact: Cara Zimmermann
(732) 201-4133

NCOIL WORKERS’ COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMMITTEE HAS INTERIM CONFERENCE CALL
Discussed Impact of COVID-19 on Workers’ Compensation Insurance Marketplace

Manasquan, NJ – The National Council of Insurance Legislators (NCOIL) Workers’ Compensation Insurance Committee, Chaired by Kentucky Representative Bart Rowland, held an interim conference call on May 29th to discuss the overall impact of COVID-19 on the workers’ compensation insurance marketplace. The discussion was highlighted by the efforts taken by several states to expand access to workers’ compensation coverage for COVID-19 to include all workers labeled “essential.”

Chair Bart Rowland (Rep. – KY) stated, “[t]hank you to all who participated on this call to discuss some very important and timely issues that our nation is facing. After listening to comments from both supporters and opponents of presumptions for COVID-19, NCOIL can better assess the situation going forward.”

“The interim conference call meeting was the highest attended teleconference meeting NCOIL has held since I’ve been here, or that is reflected in NCOIL’s records” stated Cmsr. Tom Considine, NCOIL CEO. “We had over 100 participants which included 18 legislators from 14 states, which is just terrific,” he continued. Minutes from the call can be found on the NCOIL website here.

“Of course, panelists had different views on the matter, which we expect when we have discussions like this at NCOIL. I feel that this was very beneficial, and the call gave the committee members much to consider. One thing most of us can agree on is that this virus is unlikely to go away soon and pressure is growing to help the employees of essential businesses, which naturally puts some attention on the workers’ compensation system,” Rowland concluded.

Consistent with NCOIL’s longstanding policy, panelists presented views from multiple perspectives on the issue. Speakers included: Jeff Eddinger, Senior Division Executive for the National Council on Compensation Insurance (NCCI); Mitch Steiger, Legislative Advocate at the California Labor Federation (CLF); Richard Marcolus, Chair of the New Jersey Council of Safety & Health (COSH); Dr. Robert Hartwig, Clinical Associate Professor in the Finance Department and Director at the Center for Risk and Uncertainty Management at the Darla Moore School of Business University of South Carolina; and Erin Collins, Vice President of State Affairs for the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies (NAMIC).

NCOIL President, IN Rep. Matt Lehman stated, “The long-term economic impact of COVID-19 is currently unknown. NCOIL is dedicated to learning as much as it can in order to find the best solutions to the devastating effects of the virus. In the context of the workers’ compensation system, it is paramount that industry solvency is maintained and employees have benefits when they need them most.”

Considine said, “When issues like this arise, NCOIL is a great forum to help educate legislators from different states with similar goals by having a conversation to improve the quality of public policy. There is no question that there is a natural tug to want to provide compensation to essential workers who have fallen ill to COVID-19. The workers’ compensation system exists because of the risk of getting sick or injured on the job, but the illness or injury has to arise ‘out of the employment’ or in the ‘course of employment’ to be covered. The dilemma is twofold whether COVID meets either of those tests and whether the system can handle a pandemic. Congress and state legislature must best balance the interests of businesses, employees and insurers in making these policy choices.”

If you joined the call and would like to the chance to discuss any issues further, please reach out to NCOIL General Counsel Will Melofchik at [email protected].

-30-

NCOIL is a national legislative organization with the nation’s 50 states as members, represented principally by legislators serving on their states’ insurance and financial institutions committees. NCOIL writes Model Laws in insurance and financial services, works to preserve the State jurisdiction over insurance as established by the McCarran-Ferguson Act seventy-five years ago, and to serve as an educational forum for public policymakers and interested parties. Founded in 1969, NCOIL works to assert the prerogative of legislators in making State policy when it comes to insurance and educate State legislators on current and longstanding insurance issues.

NCOIL Applauds Introduction of Pandemic Risk Insurance Act

For Immediate Release
May 28, 2020
Contact: Cara Zimmermann
(732) 201-4133

NCOIL APPLAUDS INTRODUCTION OF THE PANDEMIC RISK INSURANCE ACT
Also Urges Congress to Focus on Current Business Interruption Losses

Manasquan, NJ – The National Council of Insurance Legislators announced today that is applauds the introduction of the Pandemic Risk Insurance Act of 2020 (PRIA), which was formally introduced on Friday, May 22nd. NCOIL President, IN Representative Matt Lehman stated, “While NCOIL is conceptually supportive of PRIA, we will need further discussion together on the details. Also, while PRIA would provide a backstop for losses after its passage, it is imperative that Congress continue focusing on those current, mounting uninsured losses that fall outside business interruption and event cancellation policies’ protection.”

PRIA, sponsored by Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D, NY), would provide for a transparent system of shared public and private compensation for business interruption losses resulting from a pandemic or outbreak of communicable disease. The new legislation is pulling from lessons learned during the business interruption the country saw around the 9/11 terrorist attacks. PRIA would operate entirely prospectively, enabling businesses, professionals and associations to procure pandemic coverage in the future because insurers will not exclude it once a federal backstop is in place, much like terrorism insurance became available once the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA) passed. PRIA would be triggered if industry losses exceed the $250 million threshold.

“We look forward to working with Congresswoman Maloney to make sure that there is not unlimited liability for the insurance industry. NCOIL agrees that it is important that the insurance industry participate in the PRIA system; however, it is imperative that any legislation not threaten the solvency of the industry or companies within it,” Lehman continued.

Following the tragedy of 9/11/2001, Congress moved in a way that addressed both the immediate crisis and a prospective solution by enacting both TRIA and the Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act and included within it the Victims Compensation Fund (VCF). NCOIL urges a similar solution now for the legion of businesses and professionals who are suffering from unprecedented costs from the interruption of their businesses as well as the many associations who have had to cancel their events, virtually all of whom have an exclusion in their business interruption and event cancellation policies for communicable diseases.

Lehman concluded that “it is important that NCOIL remains part of the discussion with Congress since, among other things, any plan will involve the states’ role in maintaining insurance industry solvency”.

In the VCF it was necessary to construct an entire claims adjudication process. NCOIL believes this can be avoided for the current pandemic emergency. These claims, while contractually excluded, are not novel; they are the very type of claims that U.S. insurers have been adjudicating for over a century. In addition to PRIA, NCOIL suggests that a Congressional Act creating a COVID-19 Business Interruption & Cancellation Claims Fund (COVID Claims Fund) incorporate the usage of the insurance industry’s claims processing systems to handle claims processing for the Fund in order to ensure all claims are validated prior to payment, removing any that do not meet the established criteria.

NCOIL CEO, Commissioner Tom Considine said, “While the introduction of PRIA is a positive development to protect businesses, professionals, and associations from losses due to a future pandemic or outbreak of communicable disease, it is imperative that a COVID Claims Fund be enacted and set up so that those that have already been harmed by COVID-19 receive the help that they deserve. NCOIL’s communication with Congresswoman Maloney regarding PRIA will be vital in ensuring there is not crippling exposure for the insurance industry.”

Bill text for H.R. 7011, the Pandemic Risk Insurance Act of 2020, can be viewed below:
https://maloney.house.gov/sites/maloney.house.gov/files/PRIA%20bill%20text.pdf

-30-

NCOIL is a national legislative organization with the nation’s 50 states as members, represented principally by legislators serving on their states’ insurance and financial institutions committees. NCOIL writes Model Laws in insurance and financial services, works to preserve the State jurisdiction over insurance as established by the McCarran-Ferguson Act seventy-five years ago, and to serve as an educational forum for public policymakers and interested parties. Founded in 1969, NCOIL works to assert the prerogative of legislators in making State policy when it comes to insurance and educate State legislators on current and longstanding insurance issues

NCOIL and Rutgers Center for Risk and Responsibility to Host Webinar to Discuss Legislative Responses to Business Interruption Insurance and COVID-19

 

For Immediate Release
April 21, 2020
Contact: Cara Zimmermann
(732) 201-4133

NCOIL AND RUTGERS CENTER FOR RISK AND RESPONSIBLITY TO HOST WEBINAR TO DISCUSS LEGISLATIVE RESPONSES TO BUSINESS INTERRUPTION INSURANCE AND COVID-19

Manasquan, NJ – The National Council of Insurance Legislators (NCOIL) and the Rutgers Center for Risk and Responsibility at Rutgers Law School are sponsoring a webinar to discuss legislative responses to business interruption insurance and COVID-19 on Friday, April 24, at 1:00 p.m. Eastern time.

During this time of global crisis, the issue of business interruption insurance coverage for losses related to the outbreak of COVID-19 has been a constant in both headlines across the country and the NCOIL mailbox. Bills have been introduced in multiple state legislatures as well as Congress that would mandate coverage and would create backup funding mechanisms for insurers.

Legislation has been discussed or introduced in Louisiana, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and South Carolina that would retroactively enact business interruption coverage into existing policies despite an absence of the physical damage required in property policies and/or express exclusions for communicable diseases in those policies.

NCOIL President, IN Rep. Matt Lehman, said, “We understand that the nation is facing unprecedented, urgent social and economic issues. NCOIL is working to ensure that sound public policy relating to COVID-19 is enacted to help resolve the impacts of the crisis. I look forward to speaking with my insurance legislator colleagues and business professionals from all over the country to discuss NCOIL’s opposition to this type of retroactive legislation and set forth NCOIL’s support for Congress to take action and enact legislation that would guard against future harm related to a pandemic or outbreak of communicable disease, and help those that have already been harmed by COVID-19.”

The webinar will cover business interruption insurance coverage issues, the legislative proposals, the reason for and the cost of proposals, and state and federal constitutional issues.

Participants will include NJ Asm. Lou Greenwald, NJ Assembly Majority Leader; IN Majority Leader Rep. Matt Lehman, NCOIL President; Jim Lynch, Chief Actuary and Senior VP of Research and Education at the Insurance Information Institute (III); and Jay Feinman and Adam Scales, Professors of Law at Rutgers Law School and Co-Directors of the Rutgers Center for Risk and Responsibility.

Distinguished Rutgers Law School Professor, Jay Feinman stated, “We at the Rutgers Center for Risk and Responsibility explore ways in which society makes choices about risk, its proper allocation, and compensation for the harm caused when risks materialize. Scholars at the Center are closely studying the crisis rising as a result of claims under these insurance policies. Businesses faced with huge and unexpected losses naturally turn to their insurance for compensation, and legislators who are looking to help businesses out see insurance as a vehicle for doing so.”

“NCOIL is pleased to host this webinar with the Rutgers Center for Risk and Responsibility, a nationally known center for insurance expertise. The timing of this webinar is critical as NCOIL has reached out to states and Congress to express concerns about retroactive insurance coverage legislation and to advocate for the creation of a COVID-19 Business Interruption & Cancellation Claims Fund (COVID Claims Fund),” stated NCOIL CEO, Commissioner Tom Considine.

“We urge a similar solution to the 9/11 Victims Compensation Fund enacted by Congress in 2001, now for the legion of businesses & professionals who are suffering from unprecedented costs from the interruption of their businesses as well as the many associations who have had to cancel their events, virtually all of whom have an exclusion in their business interruption and event cancellation policies for communicable diseases,” Considine concluded.

Please follow this link to register:
https://rutgers.webex.com/rutgers/onstage/g.php?MTID=e25985f1513ef0355998751d6dd1e4965

Please also visit the NCOIL COVID-19 Resource Page for information and updates on industry, state, and federal insurance-related initiatives relating to the outbreak of COVID-19: https://ncoil.org/ncoil-covid-19-resource-page/

-30-

NCOIL is a national legislative organization with the nation’s 50 states as members, represented principally by legislators serving on their states’ insurance and financial institutions committees. NCOIL writes Model Laws in insurance and financial services, works to preserve the State jurisdiction over insurance as established by the McCarran-Ferguson Act seventy-five years ago, and to serve as an educational forum for public policymakers and interested parties. Founded in 1969, NCOIL works to assert the prerogative of legislators in making State policy when it comes to insurance and educate State legislators on current and longstanding insurance issues.

NCOIL Comments on Federal Legislation

For Immediate Release
April 6, 2020
Contact: Cara Zimmermann
(732) 201-4133

NCOIL COMMENTS ON FEDERAL LEGISLATION
The Preventing Credit Score Discrimination in Auto Insurance Act and The Catastrophe Loss Mitigation Incentive and Tax Parity Act of 2019

Manasquan, NJ – The National Council of Insurance Legislators (NCOIL), announced its opposition to a piece of federal insurance legislation today, while supporting an unrelated disaster mitigation bill. Commissioner Tom Considine, NCOIL CEO, wrote to Rep. Rashida Tlaib opposing H.R. 1756, the Preventing Credit Score Discrimination in Auto Insurance Act, as well as to Rep. Mike Thompson, Chair of the House Subcommittee on Select Revenue Measures, in support of H.R. 5494, the Catastrophe Loss Mitigation Incentive and Tax Parity Act of 2019.

H.R. 1756 seeks to ensure there is no unfair discrimination in automobile insurance underwriting. While the intent of the bill is noble, NCOIL believes there remains confusion and misinformation surrounding how and why insurers use certain factors to underwrite, such as credit information. The business of insurance is centered on predicting the level of risk an applicant or policyholder represents and charging a premium that corresponds to that level of risk. Credit-based insurance scores have proven to be a very accurate predictor of risk within the
property and casualty insurance industry.

In 2002, NCOIL adopted the Model Act Regarding use of Credit Information in Personal Insurance (Model) in an effort to both recognize the benefits of credit-based insurance scores and to afford consumers protections with respect to the use of their credit information. The Model has been adopted by 30 states and has served to protect consumers while helping to promote competitive insurance marketplaces. The Model can be viewed here.

NCOIL President, IN Rep. Matt Lehman, said, “The issue of credit score discrimination in insurance has been a recurring hot topic for the last 20 years. It is also important to note that states have jurisdiction to regulate the business of insurance pursuant to the McCarran-Ferguson Act of 1945. In this instance, NCOIL opposes federal involvement as an infringement on the states’ well-established authority to oversee the business of insurance and determine what is best for their individual states.”

Considine stated that he was “perhaps as surprised as anyone, and more surprised than most, when the use of credit score proved to be an actuarially sound factor to consider in auto insurance underwriting, but you cannot argue with the conclusions. The statistically supported validity of the numbers is compelling.”

H.R. 5494 would exempt from federal taxation state-based grants that support pre-disaster mitigation for homes against wildfires, windstorms, and earthquakes. NCOIL recognizes the fact that natural disasters are occurring with more frequency, and that steps need to be taken to ensure that people are encouraged to take action with respect to utilizing pre-disaster mitigation programs.

Currently, there is inconsistent tax treatment of state and federal disaster mitigation grants. Congress previously excluded grants provided by FEMA from federal income tax, but state grants are subject to federal income tax. By simply fixing this inconsistency and providing tax parity for certain state-based pre-disaster grant programs, homeowners will be further empowered to protect their homes from natural disasters.

NCOIL CEO Commissioner Tom Considine stated, “We at NCOIL commend Chairman Thompson for introducing H.R. 5494 and taking action to alleviate the harmful impact of future natural disasters. This bipartisan legislation would encourage property owners to utilize federal aid to enhance their safety rather than being penalized for receiving these resources that could protect against disasters. NCOIL supports these vital mitigation efforts and looks forward to other steps to help safeguard Americans from natural disasters.”

The letter on H.R. 1756 can be viewed here.

The letter on H.R. 5494 can be viewed here.

Information and updates on H.R. 1756 can be viewed here.

Information and updates on H.R. 5494 can be viewed here.

-30-

NCOIL is a national legislative organization with the nation’s 50 states as members, represented principally by legislators serving on their states’ insurance and financial institutions committees. NCOIL writes Model Laws in insurance and financial services, works to preserve the State jurisdiction over insurance as established by the McCarran-Ferguson Act seventy-five years ago, and to serve as an educational forum for public policymakers andinterested parties. Founded in 1969, NCOIL works to assert the prerogative of legislators in making State policy when it comes to insurance and educate State legislators on current and longstanding insurance issues.

 

NCOIL Adopts Insurance Business Transfer Model Act

For Immediate Release
March 31, 2020
Contact: Cara Zimmermann
(732) 201-4133

NCOIL ADOPTS INSURANCE BUSINESS TRANSFER MODEL ACT
Provides for Improved Operational and Capital Efficiency for Insurance Companies while Ensuring Policyholders are Notified and Protected

Manasquan, NJ – At the recently concluded 2020 NCOIL Spring Meeting in Charlotte, NC, the organization adopted the NCOIL Insurance Business Transfer (IBT) Model Act sponsored by NY Assemblyman Andrew Garbarino and OK Representative Lewis Moore. The measure passed on a voice vote by the NCOIL Joint State-Federal Relations & International Insurance Issues Committee and was affirmed by the Executive Committee.

The OK IBT Law, signed into law in 2018, was introduced to NCOIL to serve as a basis for an NCOIL IBT Model at the 2018 NCOIL Annual Meeting in Oklahoma City, OK. NY Asm. Andrew Garbarino and OK Rep. Lewis Moore then introduced a discussion draft of an NCOIL IBT Model Law at the 2019 NCOIL Spring Meeting in Nashville, TN, based on the OK IBT law.

NY Asm. Andrew Garbarino stated, “I greatly appreciate the Committee’s work on the NCOIL IBT Model and there were a lot of great points made by the panels throughout drafting discussions. The OK IBT Law was a solid foundation to use when considering IBT model legislation. The most frequently used restructuring options in this country are sale and reinsurance or limited portfolio transfers (LPTs) but those options are limited in their scope and effect. There is a need for consistency among states and it seems to be generally agreeable that IBTs can be valuable as long as they are done properly with the right level of consumer protections.”

OK Rep. Lewis Moore said, “I want to echo what Asm. Garbarino stated and thank the Committee and all interested parties for their work and input throughout the drafting process. During the Model legislation drafting discussions, I stressed the importance of the protection of policyholders and worked with NCOIL to ensure that issue remained in the Model. As is always the case with NCOIL models, states are free to change any provisions they deem appropriate. State interest in IBTs has continued to grow significantly since initially discussing IBTs at the 2018 NCOIL Annual Meeting, making it that much more important to send this Model to the states and adequately address the issue.”

During the drafting discussions, NCOIL legislators and staff heard from a wide array of interested parties including: PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLC (PWC); the Oklahoma Dept. of Insurance; the Reinsurance Assoc. of America (RAA); the Rhode Island Dept. of Business Regulation; Enstar; New York Life; the American Council of Life Insurers (ACLI); Brighthouse Financial; International Solutions Services, LLC; Faegre Baker Daniels, LLP; the National Organization of Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Associations (NOLGHA); the National Conference of Insurance Guaranty Funds (NCIGF); and the American Property & Casualty Insurance Association (APCIA).

The purpose of the Model is “to provide options to address the significant limitations in the current methods available to insurers to transfer or assume blocks of insurance business in an efficient and cost-effective manner that provides needed legal finality for such transfers in order to provide for improved operational and capital efficiency for insurance companies, stimulates the economy by attracting segments of the insurance industry to the state, make this state an attractive home jurisdiction for insurance companies, encourages economic growth and increased investment in the financial services sector and increases the availability of quality insurance industry jobs in this state.”

Highlights of the Model include requirements that the IBT applicant notify interested parties such as: the chief insurance regulator in each jurisdiction in which the applicant holds or has ever held a certificate of authority, and in which policies that are part of the subject business were
issued or policyholders currently reside; the National Conference of Insurance Guaranty Funds, the National Organization of Life and Health Insurance Guaranty Associations and all state insurance guaranty associations for the states in which the applicant holds or has ever held a certificate of authority, and in which policies that are part of the subject business were issued or policyholders currently reside; reinsurers of the applicant pursuant to the notice provisions of the reinsurance agreements applicable to the policies that are part of the subject business, or where an agreement has no provision for notice, by internationally recognized delivery service; all policyholders holding policies that are part of the subject business, at their last-known address as indicated by the records of the applicant or to the address to which premium notices or other policy documents are sent; and by publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the state in which the applicant has its principal place of business and in such other publications that the Commissioner requires.

The Model also requires that the Insurance Business Transfer Plan must be filed by the applicant with the Insurance Commissioner for his or her review and approval. The Plan must include information such as: a summary of the Insurance Business Transfer Plan; an identification and
description of the subject business; the most recent audited financial statements and statutory annual and quarterly reports of the transferring insurer and assuming insurer filed with their domiciliary regulator the most recent actuarial report and opinion that quantify the liabilities associated with the subject business; pro-forma financial statements showing the projected statutory balance sheet; results of operations and cash flows of the assuming insurer for the three (3) years following the proposed transfer and novation; the officers’ certificates of the transferring insurer and the assuming insurer attesting that each has obtained all required internal approvals and authorizations regarding the Insurance Business Transfer Plan and completed all necessary and appropriate actions relating thereto; the proposal for Plan implementation and administration, including the form of notice to be provided under the Insurance Business Transfer Plan to any policyholder whose policy is part of the subject business; a full description as to how such notice shall be provided; a description of any reinsurance arrangements that would pass to the assuming insurer under the Insurance Business Transfer Plan; a description of any guarantees or additional reinsurance that will cover the subject business following the transfer and novation; a statement describing the assuming insurer’s proposed investment policies and any contemplated third-party claims management and administration arrangements; a description of how the transferring and assuming insurers will be licensed for guaranty association coverage purpose; and evidence of approval or nonobjection of the transfer from the chief insurance regulator of the state of the transferring insurer’s domicile.

Importantly, the Insurance Business Transfer plan must also contain a report from an independent expert, selected by the Commissioner from a list of at least two nominees submitted jointly by the transferring insurer and the assuming insurer, to assist the Commissioner and the court in connection with their review of the proposed transaction. Should the Commissioner, in his or her sole discretion, reject the nominees, he or she may appoint the independent expert. The Model sets forth specific requirements for what the independent expert report must contain such as the independent expert’s opinion of the likely effects of the Insurance Business Transfer Plan on policyholders and claimants, distinguishing between transferring policyholders and claimants, policyholders and claimants of the transferring insurer whose policies will not be transferred, and policyholders and claimants of the assuming insurer.

The Model then requires the Commissioner to authorize the submission of the Plan to the court unless he or she finds that the Insurance Business Transfer would have a material adverse impact on the interests of policyholders or claimants that are part of the subject business. Within thirty (30) days after notice from the Commissioner that the applicant may proceed with the court filing, the Model then directs the applicant to apply to the court for approval of the Insurance Business Transfer Plan.

Following a court hearing, which the Model requires all parties to be notified of and provides them the opportunity to present evidence or comments if he, she, or itself considers to be adversely affected by the transfer, the Model requires the court to enter a judgment and implementation order if the court finds that the implementation of the Insurance Business Transfer Plan would not materially adversely affect the interests of policyholders or
claimants that are part of the subject business.

The judgment and implementation order shall: order implementation of the Insurance Business Transfer Plan; order a statutory novation with respect to all policyholders or reinsureds and their respective policies and reinsurance agreements under the subject business, including the
extinguishment of all rights of policyholders under policies that are part of the subject business against the transferring insurer, and providing that the transferring insurer shall have no further rights, obligations, or liabilities with respect to such policies, and that the assuming insurer shall have all such rights, obligations, and liabilities as if it were the original insurer of such policies; release the transferring insurer from any and all obligations or liabilities under policies that are part of the subject business; authorize and order the transfer of property or liabilities, including, but not limited to, the ceded reinsurance of transferred policies and contracts on the subject business, notwithstanding any non-assignment provisions in any such reinsurance contracts. The subject business shall vest in and become liabilities of the assuming insurer; order that the applicant provide notice of the transfer and novation in accordance with the notice provisions in Section 5 of the Model; and make such other provisions with respect to incidental, consequential and supplementary matters as are necessary to assure the Insurance Business Transfer Plan is fully and effectively carried out.

The Model also requires the Commissioner to promulgate regulations that are consistent with the Model, rather than authorizing the Commissioner to do so, and states that no Insurance Business Transfer Plan shall be approved in a State unless and until such regulations are promulgated.

NCOIL CEO, Commissioner Tom Considine, stated, “IBTs can be a driver for economic expansion which makes it vital for the states to understand the tools and guidelines that this Model has to offer. These are complex transactions, and making sure the appropriate regulations are promulgated before an IBT is approved is critical in ensuring both businesses and consumers are properly protected. Thank you to the Committee, and a special thanks to Asm. Garbarino and Rep. Moore for sponsoring this and getting the Model to a good place to be ready to send to the states.”

A full copy of the model is below

 

National Council of Insurance Legislators (NCOIL)

Insurance Business Transfer Model Act

*Sponsored by Asm. Andrew Garbarino (NY) and Rep. Lewis Moore (OK)

*Adopted by the Joint State-Federal Relations and International Insurance Issues Committee on March 6, 2020 and by the Executive Committee on March 8, 2020.

Table of Contents

Section 1. Title
Section 2. Purpose
Section 3. Definitions
Section 4. Court Authority
Section 5. Notice Requirements
Section 6. Application Procedure
A. Submitting Application of Insurance Business Transfer Plan to Insurance Commissioner
B. Application to the Court for Approval of the Insurance Business Transfer Plan
C. Approval of the Insurance Business Transfer Plan
D. Implementation of Insurance Business Transfer Plan
Section 7. Ongoing Oversight by Insurance Commissioner
Section 8. Fees and Costs
Section 9. Effective Date

Section 1. Title

This act shall be known and may be cited as the “Insurance Business Transfer Act”.

Section 2. Purpose

This act is adopted to provide options to address the significant limitations in the current methods available to insurers to transfer or assume blocks of insurance business in an efficient and cost-effective manner that provides needed legal finality for such transfers in order to provide for improved operational and capital efficiency for insurance companies, stimulates the economy by attracting segments of the insurance industry to the state, make this state an attractive home jurisdiction for insurance companies, encourages economic growth and increased investment in the financial services sector and increases the availability of quality insurance industry jobs in this state. These purposes are accomplished by providing a basis and procedures for the transfer and statutory novation of policies from a transferring insurer to an assuming insurer by way of an Insurance Business Transfer without the affirmative consent of policyholders or reinsureds. The novation is effected by court order. This act establishes the requirements for notice and disclosure and standards and procedures for the approval of the transfer and novation by the State Insurance Commissioner and a District Court pursuant to an Insurance Business Transfer Plan. This act does not limit or restrict other means of effecting a transfer or novation.

Section 3. Definitions

A. “Affiliate” means a person that directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with, the person specified.

B. “Applicant” means a transferring insurer or reinsurer applying under Section 6 of this act.

C. “Assuming insurer” means an insurer domiciled in this State that assumes or seeks to assume policies from a transferring insurer pursuant to this act. An assuming insurer may be a company established pursuant to the State Captive Insurance Company Act.

D. “Court” means the [District Court].

Drafting Note: Each state shall identify the specific court that shall have jurisdiction and venue

E. “Department” means the State Insurance Department.

Drafting Note: In certain states “State Insurance Department” may be replaced with the regulatory body that has jurisdiction over insurance

F. “Commissioner” means the State Insurance Commissioner.

G. “Implementation order” means an order issued by the Court under Section 6 of this act.

H. “Insurance Business Transfer” means a transfer and novation in accordance with this act. Insurance Business Transfers will transfer insurance obligations or risks, or both, of existing or in-force contracts of insurance or reinsurance from a transferring insurer to an assuming insurer. Once approved pursuant to this act, the Insurance Business Transfer will effect a novation of the transferred contracts of insurance or reinsurance with the result that the assuming insurer becomes directly liable to the policyholders of the transferring insurer and the transferring insurer’s insurance obligations or risks, or both, under the contracts are extinguished.

I. “Insurance Business Transfer Plan” or “Plan” means the plan submitted to the Department to accomplish the transfer and novation pursuant to an Insurance Business Transfer, including any associated transfer of assets and rights from or on behalf of the transferring insurer to the assuming insurer.

J. “Independent expert” means an impartial person who has no financial interest in either the assuming insurer or transferring insurer, has not been employed by or acted as an officer, director, consultant or other independent contractor for either the assuming insurer or transferring insurer within the past twelve (12) months, is not appointed by the Commissioner to assist in any capacity in any insurer rehabilitation or delinquency proceeding and is receiving no compensation in connection with the transaction governed by this act other than a fee based on a fixed or hourly basis that is not contingent on the approval or consummation of an Insurance Business Transfer and provides proof of insurance coverage that is satisfactory to the
Commissioner.

K. “Insurer” means an insurance or surety company, including a reinsurance company, and shall be deemed to include a corporation, company, partnership, association, society, order, individual or aggregation of individuals engaging in or proposing or attempting to engage in any kind of
insurance or surety business, including the exchanging of reciprocal or inter-insurance contracts between individuals, partnerships and corporations.

L. “Policy” means a policy, annuity contract or certificate of insurance or a contract of reinsurance pursuant to which the insurer agrees to assume an obligation or risk, or both, of the policyholder or to make payments on behalf of, or to, the policyholder or its beneficiaries, and shall include property, casualty, life, health and any other line of insurance the Commissioner finds via regulation is suitable for an insurance business transfer.

Drafting Note: States may wish to remove certain lines of insurance from the scope of an insurance business transfer.

M. “Policyholder” means an insured or a reinsured under a policy that is part of the subject business.

N. “Subject business” means the policy or policies that are the subject of the Insurance Business Transfer Plan.

O. “Transfer and novation” means the transfer of insurance obligations or risks, or both, of existing or in-force policies from a transferring insurer to an assuming insurer, and is intended to effect a novation of the transferred policies with the result that the assuming insurer becomes directly liable to the policyholders of the transferring insurer on the transferred policies and the transferring insurer’s insurance obligations or risks, or both, under the transferred policies are extinguished.

P. “Transferring insurer” means an insurer or reinsurer that transfers and novates or seeks to transfer and novate obligations or risks, or both, under one or more policies to an assuming insurer pursuant to an Insurance Business Transfer Plan.

Section 4. Court Authority

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the court may issue any order, process, or judgment that is necessary or appropriate to carry out the provisions of this act. No provision of this act shall be construed to preclude the court from, on its own motion, taking any action or making any determination necessary or appropriate to enforce or implement court orders or rules, or to prevent an abuse of power.

Section 5. Notice Requirements

A. Whenever notice is required to be given by the applicant under the Insurance Business Transfer Act and except as otherwise permitted or directed by the court or the Insurance Commissioner, the applicant shall, within fifteen (15) days of the event triggering the requirement, cause transmittal of the notice:

1. To the chief insurance regulator in each jurisdiction in which the applicant:

a. holds or has ever held a certificate of authority, and

b. in which policies that are part of the subject business were issued or policyholders currently reside;

2. To the National Conference of Insurance Guaranty Funds, the National Organization of Life and Health Insurance Guaranty Associations and all state insurance guaranty associations for the states in which the applicant:

a. holds or has ever held a certificate of authority, and

b. in which policies that are part of the subject business were issued or policyholders currently reside;

3. To reinsurers of the applicant pursuant to the notice provisions of the reinsurance agreements applicable to the policies that are part of the subject business, or where an agreement has no provision for notice, by internationally recognized delivery service;

4. To all policyholders holding policies that are part of the subject business, at their lastknown address as indicated by the records of the applicant or to the address to which premium notices or other policy documents are sent. A notice of transfer shall also be sent to the transferring insurer’s agents or brokers of record on the subject business; and

5. By publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the state in which the applicant has its principal place of business and in such other publications that the Commissioner requires

B. If notice is given in accordance with this section, any orders under this act shall be conclusive with respect to all intended recipients of the notice, whether or not they receive actual notice.

C. Where this act requires that the applicant provide notice but the Commissioner has been named receiver of the applicant, the Commissioner shall provide the required notice.

D. Notice under this section may take the form of first-class mail, facsimile and/or electronic notice.

Section 6. Application Procedure

A. Application Procedure.

1. An Insurance Business Transfer Plan must be filed by the applicant with the Insurance Commissioner for his or her review and approval. The Plan must contain the information set forth below or an explanation as to why the information is not included. The Plan may be supplemented by other information deemed necessary by the Commissioner:

a. the name, address and telephone number of the transferring insurer and the assuming insurer and their respective direct and indirect controlling persons, if any,

b. summary of the Insurance Business Transfer Plan,

c. identification and description of the subject business,

d. most recent audited financial statements and statutory annual and quarterly reports of the transferring insurer and assuming insurer filed with their domiciliary regulator,

e. the most recent actuarial report and opinion that quantify the liabilities associated with the subject business,

f. pro-forma financial statements showing the projected statutory balance sheet, results of operations and cash flows of the assuming insurer for the three (3) years following the proposed transfer and novation,

g. officers’ certificates of the transferring insurer and the assuming insurer attesting that each has obtained all required internal approvals and authorizations regarding the Insurance Business Transfer Plan and completed all necessary and appropriate actions relating thereto,

h. proposal for Plan implementation and administration, including the form of notice to be provided under the Insurance Business Transfer Plan to any policyholder whose policy is part of the subject business,

i. full description as to how such notice shall be provided,

j. description of any reinsurance arrangements that would pass to the assuming insurer under the Insurance Business Transfer Plan,

k. description of any guarantees or additional reinsurance that will cover the subject business following the transfer and novation,

l. a statement describing the assuming insurer’s proposed investment policies and any contemplated third-party claims management and administration arrangements,

m. description of how the transferring and assuming insurers will be licensed for guaranty association coverage purposes,

Drafting Note: The regulatory authorization language of Section 6D. is meant to allow for the promulgation of regulations that address issues including, but not limited to:

(1) Guaranty association coverage;

(2) The financial implications of the transaction including solvency, capital adequacy, cash flow, reserves, asset quality and risk-based capital;

(3) An analysis of the assuming insurer’s corporate governance structure to ensure that there is proper board management oversight and expertise to
manage the subject business;

(4) The competency, experience and integrity of the persons who would control the operation of an involved insurer; and

(5) Ensuring the transaction is not being made for improper purposes, including fraud.

n. evidence of approval or nonobjection of the transfer from the chief insurance regulator of the state of the transferring insurer’s domicile, and

o. a report from an independent expert, selected by the Commissioner from a list of at least two nominees submitted jointly by the transferring insurer and the assuming insurer, to assist the Commissioner and the court in connection with their review of the proposed transaction. Should the Commissioner, in his or her sole discretion, reject the nominees, he or she may appoint the independent expert. The report shall provide the following:

(1) a statement of the independent expert’s professional qualifications and descriptions of the experience that qualifies him or her as an expert
suitable for the engagement,

(2) whether the independent expert has, or has had, direct or indirect interest in the transferring or assuming insurer or any of their respective
affiliates,

(3) the scope of the report,

(4) a summary of the terms of the Insurance Business Transfer Plan to the extent relevant to the report,

(5) a listing and summaries of documents, reports and other material information the independent expert has considered in preparing the report and whether any information requested was not provided,

(6) the extent to which the independent expert has relied on information provided by and the judgment of others,

(7) the people on whom the independent expert has relied and why, in his or her opinion, such reliance is reasonable,

(8) the independent expert’s opinion of the likely effects of the Insurance Business Transfer Plan on policyholders and claimants, distinguishing between:

(a) transferring policyholders and claimants,

(b) policyholders and claimants of the transferring insurer whose policies will not be transferred, and

(c) policyholders and claimants of the assuming insurer,

(9) for each opinion that the independent expert expresses in the report the facts and circumstances supporting the opinion, and

(10) consideration as to whether the security position of policyholders that are affected by the Insurance Business Transfer are materially adversely
affected by the transfer.

2. The independent expert’s report as required by subparagraph o of paragraph 1 of this subsection shall include, but not be limited to, a review of the following:

a. analysis of the transferring insurer’s actuarial review of reserves for the subject business to determine the reserve adequacy,

b. analysis of the financial condition of the transferring and assuming insurers and the effect the transfer will have on the financial condition of each company,

c. review of the plans or proposals the assuming insurer has with respect to the administration of the policies subject to the proposed transfer,

d. whether the proposed transfer has a material, adverse impact on the policyholders and claimants of the transferring and the assuming insurers,

e. analysis of the assuming insurer’s corporate governance structure to ensure that there is proper board and management oversight and expertise to manage the subject business, and

f. any other information that the Commissioner requests in order to review the Insurance Business Transfer.

3. The Commissioner shall have sixty (60) business days from the date of receipt of a complete Insurance Business Transfer Plan to review the Plan to determine if the applicant is authorized to submit it to the court. The Commissioner may extend the sixtyday review period for an additional thirty (30) business days.

4. The Commissioner shall authorize the submission of the Plan to the court unless he or she finds that the Insurance Business Transfer would have a material adverse impact on the interests of policyholders or claimants that are part of the subject business.

5. If the Commissioner determines that the Insurance Business Transfer would have a material adverse impact on the interests of policyholders or claimants that are part of the subject business, he or she shall notify the applicant and specify any modifications, supplements or amendments and any additional information or documentation with respect to the Plan that must be provided to the Commissioner before he or she will allow the applicant to proceed with the court filing.

6. The applicant shall have thirty (30) days from the date the Commissioner notifies him or her, pursuant to paragraph 5 of this subsection, to file an amended Insurance Business Transfer Plan providing the modifications, supplements or amendments and additional information or documentation as requested by the Commissioner. If necessary the applicant may request in writing an extension of time of thirty (30) days. If the applicant does not make an amended filing within the time period provided for in this paragraph, including any extension of time granted by the Commissioner, the Insurance Business Transfer Plan filing will terminate and a subsequent filing by the applicant will be considered a new filing which shall require compliance with all provisions of this act as if the prior filing had never been made.

7. The Commissioner’s review period in paragraph 3 of this subsection shall recommence when the modification, supplement, amendment or additional information requested in paragraph 5 of this subsection is received.

8. If the Commissioner determines that the Plan may proceed with the court filing, the Commissioner shall confirm that fact in writing to the applicant.

B. Application to the court for approval of the Insurance Business Transfer Plan.

1. Within thirty (30) days after notice from the Commissioner that the applicant may proceed with the court filing, the applicant shall apply to the court for approval of the Insurance Business Transfer Plan. Upon written request by the applicant, the Commissioner may extend the period for filing an application with the court for an additional thirty (30) days.

2. The applicant shall inform the court of the reasons why he or she petitions the court to find no material adverse impact to policyholders or claimants affected by the proposed transfer.

3. The application shall be in the form of a verified petition for implementation of the Insurance Business Transfer Plan in the court. The petition shall include the Insurance Business Transfer Plan and shall identify any documents and witnesses which the applicant intends to present at a hearing regarding the petition.

4. The Commissioner shall be a party to the proceedings before the court concerning the petition and shall be served with copies of all filings pursuant to the Rules for District Courts of the State. The Commissioner’s position in the proceeding shall not be limited by his or her initial review of the Plan.

5. Following the filing of the petition, the applicant shall file a motion for a scheduling order setting a hearing on the petition.

6. Within fifteen (15) days after receipt of the scheduling order, the applicant shall cause notice of the hearing to be provided in accordance with the notice provisions of Section 5 of this act. Following the date of distribution of the notice, there shall be a sixty-day comment period.

7. The notice to policyholders shall state or provide:

a. the date and time of the approval hearing,

b. the name, address and telephone number of the assuming insurer and transferring insurer,

c. that a policyholder may comment on or object to the transfer and novation,

d. the procedures and deadline for submitting comments or objections on the Plan,

e. a summary of any effect that the transfer and novation will have on the policyholder’s rights,

f. a statement that the assuming insurer is authorized, as provided in this section, to assume the subject business and that court approval of the Plan shall extinguish all rights of policyholders under policies that are part of the subject business against the transferring insurer,

g. that policyholders shall not have the opportunity to opt out of or otherwise reject the transfer and novation,

h. contact information for the Insurance Department where the policyholder may obtain further information, and

i. information on how an electronic copy of the Insurance Business Transfer Plan may be accessed. In the event policyholders are unable to readily access electronic copies, the applicant shall provide hard copies by first-class mail.

8. Any person, including by their legal representative, who considers himself, herself or itself to be adversely affected can present evidence or comments to the court at the approval hearing. However, such comment or evidence shall not confer standing on any person. Any person participating in the approval hearing must follow the process established by the court and shall bear his or her own costs and attorney fees.

C. Approval of the Insurance Business Transfer Plan.

1. After the comment period pursuant to paragraph 6 of subsection B of this section has ended the Insurance Business Transfer Plan shall be presented by the applicant for approval by the court.

2. At any time before the court issues an order approving the Insurance Business Transfer Plan, the applicant may withdraw the Insurance Business Transfer Plan without prejudice.

3. If the court finds that the implementation of the Insurance Business Transfer Plan would not materially adversely affect the interests of policyholders or claimants that are part of the subject business, the court shall enter a judgment and implementation order. The judgment and implementation order shall:

a. order implementation of the Insurance Business Transfer Plan,

b. order a statutory novation with respect to all policyholders or reinsureds and their respective policies and reinsurance agreements under the subject business, including the extinguishment of all rights of policyholders under policies that are part of the subject business against the transferring insurer, and providing that the transferring insurer shall have no further rights, obligations, or liabilities with respect to such policies, and that the assuming insurer shall have all such rights, obligations, and liabilities as if it were the original insurer of such policies,

c. release the transferring insurer from any and all obligations or liabilities under policies that are part of the subject business,

d. authorize and order the transfer of property or liabilities, including, but not limited to, the ceded reinsurance of transferred policies and contracts on the subject business, notwithstanding any non-assignment provisions in any such reinsurance contracts. The subject business shall vest in and become liabilities of the assuming insurer,

e. order that the applicant provide notice of the transfer and novation in accordance with the notice provisions in Section 5 of this act, and

f. make such other provisions with respect to incidental, consequential and supplementary matters as are necessary to assure the Insurance Business Transfer Plan is fully and effectively carried out.

4. If the court finds that the Insurance Business Transfer Plan should not be approved, the court by its order may:

a. deny the petition, or

b. provide the applicant leave to file an amended Insurance Business Transfer Plan and petition.

5. Nothing in this section in any way effects the right of appeal of any party.

D. Implementation of Insurance Business Transfer Plan.

The Commissioner shall promulgate rules that are consistent with the provisions of the Insurance Business Transfer Act. No insurance business transfer plan shall be approved in a State unless and until such regulations are promulgated.

E. The portion of the application for an Insurance Business Transfer that would otherwise be confidential, including any documents, materials, communications or other information submitted to the Commissioner in contemplation of such application, shall not lose such confidentiality.

Section 7. Ongoing oversight by Insurance Commissioner

Insurers subject to this act consent to the jurisdiction of the Insurance Commissioner with regard to ongoing oversight of operations, management and solvency relating to the transferred business, including the authority of the Commissioner to conduct financial analysis and examinations.

Section 8. Fees and Costs

A. At the time of filing its application with the Insurance Commissioner for review and approval of an Insurance Business Transfer Plan, the applicant shall pay a nonrefundable fee to the Insurance Department.

B. The Commissioner may retain independent attorneys, appraisers, actuaries, certified public accountants, authorized consultants, or other professionals and specialists to assist Department personnel in connection with the review required by the Insurance Business Transfer Act, the cost of which shall be borne by the applicant.

C. The transferring insurer and the assuming insurer shall jointly be obligated to pay any compensation, costs and expenses of the independent expert and any consultants retained by the independent expert and approved by the Department incurred in fulfilling the obligations of the independent expert under this act. Nothing in this act shall be construed to create any duty for the independent expert to any party other than the Department or the Court.

D. Failure to pay any of the requisite fees or costs within thirty (30) days of demand shall be grounds for the Commissioner to request that the court dismiss the petition for approval of the Insurance Business Transfer Plan prior to the filing of an implementation order by the court or, if
after the filing of an implementation order, the Commissioner may suspend or revoke the assuming insurer’s certificate of authority to transact insurance business in this state.

Section 9. Effective Date

This act shall become effective _______.

-30-

NCOIL is a national legislative organization with the nation’s 50 states as members, represented principally by legislators serving on their states’ insurance and financial institutions committees. NCOIL writes Model Laws in insurance and financial services, works to preserve the State jurisdiction over insurance as established by the McCarran-Ferguson Act seventy-five years ago, and to serve as an educational forum for public policymakers and interested parties. Founded in 1969, NCOIL works to assert the prerogative of legislators in making State policy when it comes to insurance and educate State legislators on current and longstanding insurance issues

NCOIL President and CEO Statement on Enactment of Coronavirus Relief Bill – The CARES Act

 

For Immediate Release
March 27, 2020
Contact: Cara Zimmermann
(732) 201-4133

NCOIL PRESIDENT AND CEO STATEMENT ON ENACTMENT OF CORONAVIRUS RELIEF BILL – THE CARES ACT

Manasquan, NJ – Indiana Representative Matt Lehman, NCOIL President, and Commissioner Tom Considine, NCOIL CEO, issued the following statement regarding the enactment of the historic coronavirus relief bill – The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act).

“I applaud President Trump for signing the CARES Act into law in order to provide the country the social and financial relief it needs during this time of crisis. Congress also deserves a tremendous amount of credit for working together and acting quickly to get this done. There is still much work to do, but the CARES Act is a great step towards revitalizing the country” said Lehman.

“NCOIL appreciates the bipartisan approach towards developing the CARES Act. As Congress continues its work on further coronavirus-related legislation, NCOIL believes the issue of business interruption insurance coverage as it relates to the coronavirus needs to be addressed. While we support efforts to protect businesses and professionals facing the grave economic consequences of the current crisis, we cannot support, in any manner, efforts to retroactively force coverage into the contractual agreements that are business interruption insurance policies,” said Considine.

“We believe there is a way to accommodate all of our collective concerns for the businesses and professionals facing a near full stop on their income, as well as associations who are forced to cancel their revenue generating events with a national solution that has already proved effective. Accordingly, we have reached to Congress to suggest a federal claims fund in the model of the 9/11 Victims Compensation Fund for these claims that fall outside the four corners of their insurance contracts. We look forward to working with Congress on this very important issue,” Considine concluded.

-30-

NCOIL is a national legislative organization with the nation’s 50 states as members, represented principally by legislators serving on their states’ insurance and financial institutions committees. NCOIL writes Model Laws in insurance and financial services, works to preserve the State jurisdiction over insurance as established by the McCarran-Ferguson Act seventy-five years ago, and to serve as an educational forum for public policymakers and interested parties. Founded in 1969, NCOIL works to assert the prerogative of legislators in making State policy when it comes to insurance and educate State legislators on current and longstanding insurance issues.

NCOIL Concludes Successful 2020 Spring Meeting in Charlotte

 

For Immediate Release
March 12, 2020
Contact: Cara Zimmermann
(732) 201-4133

NCOIL CONCLUDES SUCCESSFUL 2020 SPRING MEETING IN CHARLOTTE
Four New Model Laws Adopted, Keynote Speaker Addressed Coronavirus, Continued Timely Policy Discussion

Manasquan, NJ – Despite the omnipresent spectre of the coronavirus, the National Council of Insurance Legislators (NCOIL) concluded a successful 2020 Spring Meeting at the Charlotte Marriott City Center in Charlotte, North Carolina. There were 273 total registered attendees consisting of 46 legislators from 18 states, 15 first-time legislators, five Insurance Commissioners (or equivalent), and 11 insurance departments represented. Indiana Representative Matt Lehman presided over his first meeting as NCOIL President.

“Despite travel bans and precautionary procedures implemented in response to the Coronavirus pandemic, I am pleased with the large turn-out of attendees and the participation from first-time legislators in Charlotte,” said NCOIL President, IN Rep. Matt Lehman. “We had anticipated that at some point the consistent climb of attendance might begin to slow, but the data proves otherwise for the NCOIL Spring Meeting. 2020 is already demonstrating to be a busy year of policy discussion, and it’s because of everyone who shows up to engage in the critical discussions that make it possible for NCOIL to move quickly on urgent issues we face as a country.”

Participants at the Welcome Breakfast were greeted by NC Insurance Commissioner Mike Causey, followed by a presentation from Paul Tetrault, Executive Director of the Insurance Library.

Nick Davidson, Acting Director of Public Health of the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC), delivered an informative and timely Keynote Luncheon Address on COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease) awareness and prevention, followed by the most extensive Q&A session in NCOIL memory.

The agenda was highlighted by the adoption of four NCOIL Model Laws – the NCOIL Insurance Business Transfer (IBT) Model Act by the Joint State-Federal Relations & International Insurance Issues Committee, sponsored by NY Asm. Andrew Garbarino and OK Rep. Lewis Moore; the NCOIL E-Commerce Model Act sponsored by LA Rep. Edmond Jordan, the NCOIL E-Titling Model Act sponsored by WV Del. Steve Westfall, and the NCOIL Rebate Reform Model Act sponsored by NCOIL President, IN Rep. Matt Lehman, all by the Financial Services & Multi-Lines Issues Committee. Additionally, amendments to the NCOIL Market Conduct Surveillance Model Act, sponsored by IN Sen. Travis Holdman, NCOIL Immediate Past
President, were adopted by the Joint State-Federal Relations & International Insurance Issues Committee. These models and amendments were then adopted by the Executive Committee.

Dr. James M. Carson, Daniel P. Amos Distinguished Professor of Insurance of the Terry College of Business at the University of Georgia, delivered a presentation at The Institutes Griffith Foundation Legislator Luncheon titled “Considering the Economic Impact of the Insurance Industry on the States: An Overview for Public Policymakers.”

There were two enlightening general sessions: “LIBOR’s End: What Does it Mean?”; and “What States Preparing for Opioid Lawsuit Funds Can Learn from Tobacco Settlements.”

“Thank you to the wonderful host committee and NC legislators, Sens. Vickie Sawyer and Valerie Foushee, for being great hosts to us in Charlotte. I am happy to report that our ‘Handshakes Free Meeting’ was a success,” NCOIL CEO, Commissioner Tom Considine said. “There were 20 last minute cancellations due to COVID-19, but that represents just 7% of the total, and a great deal of business still moved forward.”

“The new NCOIL financial structure is working as intended, encouraging greater participation among legislators from contributing states through the stipend program. We look forward to welcoming new faces to NCOIL along with returning legislators as we take on another year of developing sound public policy,” Considine continued.

The Property & Casualty Insurance Committee continued discussion on the NCOIL E-Scooter Insurance Model Act, sponsored by ND Sen. Jerry Klein, NCOIL Chairman At-Large, in addition to having an initial discussion on the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) Casualty Actuarial & Statistical Task Force’s (CASTF) initiatives. The Committee also heard an interesting presentation from Debra Ballen, General Counsel & Chief Risk Officer for the Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety (IBHS).

The Special Committee on Natural Disaster Recovery continued discussion on the NCOIL Private Flood Insurance Model Act, sponsored by FL Rep. David Santiago. Lynne Grinsell from Zurich North America and Gina Schwitzgebel-Hardy of the North Carolina Joint Underwriting Association (NCJUA) and North Carolina Insurance Underwriting Association (NCIUA) each gave a presentation on Natural Disaster Mitigation Efforts.

The Life Insurance & Financial Planning Committee met to discuss Reforming the Life Insurance Application Process with Porter Nolan, Head of Legal at Ethos. Dr. Robert Gleeson, medical consultant to the American Council of Life Insurers (ACLI) spoke to the Committee about the fundamentals of life insurance underwriting. Representatives from the ACLI also introduced the Committee to the Paid Family Leave Income Replacement Benefits Model Act for development and consideration throughout 2020. Oklahoma Insurance Commissioner Glen Mulready gave an update on the work of the NAIC Accelerated Underwriting Working Group.

In addition to the adoption of the NCOIL IBT Model Act and amendments to the NCOIL Market Conduct Surveillance Model Act, the Joint State-Federal Relations & International Insurance Issues Committee was given a briefing on the NCOIL Comment Letter on the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Disparate Impact Rule by NCOIL CEO Commissioner Tom Considine and former Illinois Insurance Director Nat Shapo.

The Health Insurance & Long-Term Care Issues Committee had another packed agenda, during which they continued discussions on the NCOIL Short-Term Limited Duration Insurance (STLDI) Model Act and the NCOIL Health Care Sharing Ministry (HCSM) Registration Model Act, both sponsored by IN Rep. Martin Carbaugh. Additionally, the Committee held discussions on the NCOIL Patient Dental Care Bill of Rights Model Act, sponsored by ND Rep. George Keiser and AR Rep. Deborah Ferguson, and the NCOIL Vision Care Services Model Act, sponsored by OH Sen. Bob Hackett. Jean Holliday from the NC Department of Health and Human Services delivered a presentation titled “Making the Switch from Fee-for-Service to Managed Care: An Update on North Carolina’s Medicaid Transformation.”

The Workers’ Compensation Insurance Committee heard a presentation from Teri Leon of Pie Insurance focused on innovation in the workers’ compensation insurance marketplace.

In addition to the adoption of three NCOIL Model Laws, the Financial Services & Multi-Lines Issues Committee discussed the introduction of the NCOIL Model Act Concerning Statutory Thresholds for Settlements Involving Minors, sponsored by TX Rep. Tom Oliverson, M.D. and KY Rep. Joe Fischer, NCOIL Secretary. The Committee also heard a presentation from Nicole Gunderson, Managing Director at Global Insurance Accelerator, titled “Supporting and Promoting Innovation in the Insurance Industry.”

Committee minutes will be posted within the next week at www.ncoil.org.

Discussions on model laws will continue during the 2020 Summer Meeting in Jersey City, NJ, and possible interim committee calls beforehand. The NCOIL Summer Meeting will take place from July 22-25.

-30-

NCOIL is a national legislative organization with the nation’s 50 states as members, represented principally by legislators serving on their states’ insurance and financial institutions committees. NCOIL writes Model Laws in insurance and financial services, works to preserve the State jurisdiction over insurance as established by the McCarran-Ferguson Act seventy-five years ago, and to serve as an educational forum for public policymakers and interested parties. Founded in 1969, NCOIL works to assert the prerogative of legislators in making State policy when it comes to insurance and educate State legislators on current and longstanding insurance issues.